• AgreeableLandscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    It doesn’t seen to be open source. Which is a damn shame and definitely not Mozilla’s vision for their project.

    • dinomug
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s very sad, only the core, a fork of B2G, is open (MPL).

      • AgreeableLandscape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        See, this wouldn’t be a problem if they used GPL. The issue is that MPL stipulates that the modified files must be open source, while the GPL says that any derivative work must be open source.

        • dinomug
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          The same problem happens with the trademarks. That is one of the reasons to rebranding the mozilla products in FOSS projects (GNU Icecat, Iceweasel, etc.)

          Even with Rust.