California - she/her

  • 2 Posts
  • 52 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 8th, 2021

help-circle




  • The Not Just Bikes guy absolutely understands that the need for most cars disappears once city planning is done properly. The whole message, the very thesis of his entire YouTube channel is all about exactly this. His series on Strong Towns is a good example of this.

    He knows what the important issues are. This is just one video where he demonstrates in detail that the detrimental design of SUVs in the US is just one part of the overall picture. That’s why the video matters! The planning of cities is, among other things, tied to the willingness to accommodate huge, wasteful vehicles.

    The sheer fact that he is calling out this trend – his willingness to point fingers at the auto industry for manufacturing a nationwide desire (or a misguided “need”) for bigger, heavier vehicles – that’s what makes it NOT an American perspective.


  • Truthfully, I’ve not tried them.

    I was about to make a comment along the lines of “I’ve already learned how to do command line things, my OS already comes with a few shells, why SHOULD I take the time to learn a new shell?” — but then I reflected on this and realized something: it’s the same thing as saying “Windows comes with Explorer/Edge, why SHOULD I go through the trouble to pick up a new web browser?” And yet, I unquestioningly download Firefox first thing when I install a new OS, hmm.

    You’ve made me think :]




  • Great article. Tying it to notions of public health is a good step forward in advancing the conversation we should be having about the centrality of cars.

    I liked the the “Motor transport form” juxtaposed against the “Non-motor transport form” questionnaire – in particular, asking"If somebody leaves their car in the street and it gets stolen" versus “If somebody leaves their belongings in the street and it gets stolen” has me thinking.











  • dressupgeekouttoLinguisticsAuxlangers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Heh, yeah, one of the major criticisms of Esperanto is that it is quite eurocentric, too much of a Romance language – essentially, being a easy language tailored for its own creator to learn, but not necessarily easy for “anyone” to learn.

    Lojban does a better job at representing a wider spectrum of linguistic influences – but, still.