

every time I’ve joined the dsa, I’ve run into an older man who constantly reminds us that the dsa was formed to work within the Democratic Party
The strategy here is called Realignment and was advocated for by Michael Harrington in the post-Socialist Party DSOC years into DSA. It was successful in that it allowed DSOC members to have minority say and input into the 1976 Democratic Party platform which was then disregarded entirely by Carter, so it really has nothing more to show despite decades of attempts with it into the Reagan and Clinton years. Since the org’s rebirth post-2016, DSA’s long since moved on, our current trajectory is that of a proto-party and we’re aiming to act more and more like an independent party despite using their ballot line and primary process, to prepare ourselves for an eventual break from the Democratic Party.
There’s few people left in the org that argue for realignment, it’s a dead end.











I’m very proud of it, it’s a great example of the strengths of a big tent org like DSA where factions and ideologies actually work together on synthesizing something together, rather than have it be an arena of struggle to win. Can’t wait to table with physical copies of it.