• @vis4valentine
    link
    33 years ago

    And then pitch it to Netflix, gets produced by Netflix, and Netflix will make a shit ton of merch made by Asian underpaid workers and make other 5 seasons to milk if even more.

    I mean, i love the series and love how touched the topic of worker class explotation and struggle, but come on, it’s Netflix.

      • @onlooker
        link
        23 years ago

        Nothing to do with the discussion, but can someone explain this meme to me? Why is one guy in a well? Why is he smiling like a pretentious douche? Is the takeaway that the peasant is at least trying to better society, while the T-shirt guy doesn’t feel like it? I feel dumb.

        • @ChinaNumberOne
          link
          63 years ago

          this meme is usually used as response for situations like this, right-wingers often try to discredit socialists by saying shit like “but you are a millionaire”, “you are a socialist but own 4 houses”

          this meme is showing you can live in society while also criticizing it, very powerful to have it on hand

          • @onlooker
            link
            33 years ago

            Ah, I see. Thank you! That makes sense. I’ve also tracked down the original webcomic, if anyone’s interested. After reading the above explanation and the entire comic, I think I understand now.

            https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha/

    • @joojmachine
      link
      10
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I mean, no matter how good a story is or the message it tries to convey, it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t reach anyone. It’s making the success it’s making specially due to it being there, as much as I don’t like to admit it

    • @TheConquestOfBed
      link
      83 years ago

      When you point out the inherent contradictions in “content creation”:

    • Vegafjord eo
      link
      73 years ago

      I think Netflix airing documentaries that raise consciousness about certain issues is interesting. Question is, do they have upper class solidarity? Is this about backstabbing the upper class for shareholder gain?

      Or perhaps this is about controlling the narrative. Perhaps they tell small parts of the truth, but in a way that protects upper class interests?

      Or perhaps these documentaries does have a real impact, but is a calculated move to increase credibility to promote upper class interests over time.