Or do you think they’re going to liberate some parts of its code?

  • jokeyrhyme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I’m not a lawyer, but my understanding of GPL is that the requirements are only triggered if you distribute your software

    Twitch’s back-end code (server code) is never distributed to customers/users, so it ought to be completely fine to use GPL code in any way they want

    Twitch’s front-end code (desktop apps, web apps, mobile apps, etc) would count as distribution, so any use of GPL code here would have to comply with the license

    If an open-source developer wants to protect their code from the back-end code loophole (increasingly important as software-as-a-service becomes the dominant software use case) then the Aferro GPL (a.k.a AGPL) is probably what you’re after, as those requirements count network connectivity as distribution

  • ksynwa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Is it confirmed they made any GPL violations?

  • ChinaNumberOne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    they are going to apologize, release what they violated so far and once security is tighter, continue to do it

  • Kromonos@fapsi.be
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Personally, I think we just won’t hear anything more about it, and it will continue as before.