In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

  • sar1n@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve also noticed that if you do a search, click a result, then hit back to go back to the results they manipulate the results in some weird way so they’re not the exact same results you got the first time. Infuriating

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 months ago

    Odd. I wonder what is going on here because when I search that exact same query I get accurate results.

    I’ve had iffy search results before but never anything that bad.

    • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I also returned totally accurate results using the exact same query. I would really like to know what is going on here. This is a common complaint with some people using DDG, that the results are poor, but I consistently have as good if not better results than using Google.

  • devbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.

      • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        So like… all Searx instances are independent, but I can save my preferences in a reproducible query string? Or like… how’s this a long-term, easy, good move for me? (I know ≈nothing).

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can do it that way if you grab that URL from the “cookies” section. Otherwise, it can save your preferences in a cookie.

          • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Thanks!

            Do all the Searx instances generate and keep independent indexes of the entire internet, or is it more like Lemmy (where, maybe, each instance is a window into the entirety of the index)?

    • solidsnake2085@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Kagi was my favorite but their pricing model is a little too high still. If it was $5 for 500 searches I would do that but the unlimited for $10 is just a bit too high for me.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I get that not everyone has extra cash to spend. I’m very fortunate to be able to throw $10 at a problem. I don’t begrudge you if you need to save cash (I have no kids to raise, for example). But I think $10 is fair if you search a bunch. Maybe I’m overvaluing it; I have heard great things about Kagi, but I’m still fucking around on Google cause it’s “good enough,” even though it’s in great decline. Fuck it, I’m a hypocrite.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It has been doing this shit for a while. Returning results based on just one key word out of many keywords from my query.

    Lately they have been even ignoring the restrictive +“keyword” syntax and returning whatever shit just so they won’t admit their (or Microsoft’s indexer) is shit

    • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not the fact that there are filler results that bothers me, after all there might not be results for everything we may possibly search.

      It’s the fact that these are links to services which have a tie to my unique identifiers which I deliberately declined access to in all available ways!

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    What would we suggest as a realistic alternative? Sears? Startpage? Brave? (I am no expert by the way, just looking for tips)

    • currycourier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just switched to using Kagi recently and I like it a lot so far! Theres a free tier for 100/searches a month you can use to figure out if you like it.

      • Vexz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Me too. I was so reluctant to pay for a search engine at first since there are good alternatives out there I don’t have to pay for. But I just at least wanted to try the first 100 free searches and was blown away by how great it is. It has some unique features like prioritizing or blocking specific domains, lenses and custom bangs. I payed the $10 the same day for Pro tier and 5 days later (yesterday) I even upgraded to Ultimate tier with ChatGPT-4 (called Kagi Assistant). I really, really enjoy Kagi so far. Most probably it’s gonna be my one and only search engine for the next years to come.

    • coughrelief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Searx sucks for images in my experience, startpage was bought by an advertising company, brave is weird for a multitude of reasons but I don’t know how good their search engine is as I’ve never tried it

      However I do think that finding a searx instance that works for you and then using another engine like ddg for images is the way to go… You could add a shortcut like “.ddg garbage truck” for easily searching with for example ddg on firefox

        • melooone@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Also a bit confused by this. I thought the point of searxng is to combine your preferred search engines. So couldn’t I just configure ddg for the image results?

          • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Maybe their point was that you cannot filter the images, like by color, size, license, etc

            But anyway, if I want to show somebody a picture of something it works perfectly As for the results, they are pretty comparable between searx, ddg, and googlag.

            I would even say searx wins on this one because 1. It’s easier to navigate and open images 2. The nojs version of the search looks so much better than any other search engine

    • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve been using metager for some while and really like it. They’re also part of an initiative pushing for a free as in freedom search index, so that’s nice

    • Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thanks for mentioning Kagi! I’ve been looking for some Google/DDG replacement but every single one I’ve tried had some sort of dealbreaking drawback for me. Google collects all my data and heavily filters my results, DDG provides dogshit results most of the time I don’t even bother using it, Startpage is awfully slow, and I didn’t even get to understand what Searx is as looking for it led me to some random ugly pages.

      Subbed for 1 year 10 bucks plan. Works super-fast on mobile too. Hell yeah!

  • electric_nan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I get the same shit at work where I can’t use a VPN: like 7-8 relevant results then basically just ads for local businesses after that.

    • Liome@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It does though? Right under the search bar there should be a switch bar to turn on localized search, and a dropdown to pick different location.
      Or is it itself location locked?

  • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have searx, and i’m feeling like a god of search, better than google, better that bingbinggo, and anything else Although I had a lot of problems with it when I was hosting it on a RPI and docker, now i’m not, and it’s just so much better

      • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Docker by itself is not a good thing, bad with security, not entirely open source, buggy networking, not very reproducible

        The problem with docker was timeout for requests, not sure whose falt it was, but the reverse proxy container was unresponsive pretty often

        Also, yeah, RPI was not really fast too, it had 8gb ram, boot from ssd Just right now I have i9 with 64gb ram, and this is stupid fast, and actually for most of the apps the performance bump is like 50%

        About docker, really, try to look into nixos, it has a really steep learning curve, but it will worth it, and you will be able to do magic

        • andruid
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Containers are really awesome, but take a bit more to troubleshoot sometimes. Docker is not the only method to run them either. I prefer podman actually, but K3s is the next logical step for running services in a more powerful setup.

          All true FOSS too

          • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Podman is better, but believe my words, try nixos. It’s like a docker-compose file, but for a system, this is really something groundbreaking

            You specify all the system and services passwords, usernames, all the stuff, your wallpapers, directories, keys, everything

            And all basic configurations are already unified, so to enable some service you just need to add a line in your main config like services.nginx.enable = true; and it just works with all the bells and whistles (kind off, you can add much more. Even more than in containers)

            The services are usually not sandboxes, but you can sandbox them, can even run the same containers

            Sorry if you’re really not into it, it just nixos feels like a whole new lvl after podman

            edit: even like that, I manage all my machines as a fleet with nixos, all from one configuration So I can basically press a button and change all the usernames on all machines and everything will continue working

            Instead of adding each machine separately to a vpn, I just press a button and it deploys all the machines with wireguard and connects them all

            • andruid
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              No nix is super cool! I really like the idea that guix and nix in having that system as code from build to deployment. I am not sure yet on how I feel about it for fleet/cluster deployments, k8s schedulers, network patterns like service meshes, ETCD, and operating on labels and cluster state are all super powerful.

              I have looked too into using nix to make OCI containers and OCI containers to make flatpaks as well. All where they make sense of course.

  • ShortN0te
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have still the same good results in ddg, no matter what device or browser. I have noticed that they have some location bias when ddg (and any other search engine i have tried) has non good results globaly but good resulta locally.

    Still better then anything i have tested. Just because there are minor anomalies i will stick with them.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As someone who is a data hoarder/curator and dives into the deep ends of web abyss, I use Searx, Startpage and Yandex. I do not mind Startpage only because I no longer use search engines that much anymore. If something truly needs to be searched, Yandex is the absolute, untouchable king for web, image and reverse image searching, and is better than Google for privacy (very low bar but > Google/Bing).

    Searx usually does deliver for the common use cases, and Startpage gives Google results minus SEO and sponsored trash.

    If I were to rank them for results based on years of experience, Yandex is easily a 10 (ignoring its unbeatable image search), Searx with “default/all” language results a 7, Startpage a 5 (censors Russian/Chinese sources since it is based on Google), Qwant probably 3.5-4 (unavailable in many regions), Google 3, DDG and Bing 2. I am not sure how Metager, Mojeek and Kagi fare, but they probably perform somewhere between Searx with “default/all” language results and DDG.

    Why Yandex is so above Searx metasearch is because its indexing is a lot faster than once a day, besides giving the experience of what Google was around 2009/10 and with no SEO crap. You will find the most obscure personal blog and website there, and DMCA bullshit does not work in Russia, which would work on any of these other search engines or metasearch instance owners.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    On DDG I can type in an exact company or product name and not get a proper result, it’s crazy. Google seems to find the stuff no problem, it’s really quite frustrating when the search engine isn’t even capable of basic queries.

  • TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, I have the same issue with DDG for something like a year now. I can’t use it anymore for basic searches, I feel like the bing api they are using is getting worse and worse.

  • somedude@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re looking for a new search engine, I’ve been using paid search provider, Kagi.com, for the last few months. They’ve been great.

    • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Slowly but surely I am coming to the realisation that free services sooner or later will drift away from their privacy claims

      • somedude@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Precisely. Ad and user data supported products will always balance making their users happy, with making their paying customers happy.

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pricing seems a bit odd to me What happens if you don’t spend all your searches? Does it carry over to next month?

      Wouldn’t it be better to pay as you go? Without the monthly requirements if they gonna have a limit anyway.

  • rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like ddg has never had good search results