I gotta give it to Stalin for saying everything nice and simple and tossing in a few jokes here and there. His Anarchism or Socialism was one of the best written books of theory I’d ever read. Stalin brings up Point A, then explains what it is, he explains the Anarchist positions/opinions on Point A, then Stalin shits on the anarchists and says “get a load of this jackass, he thinks blah blah blah about Point A! Have you ever heard of anyone so ignorant?” And on top of that, he never writes books that are especially long, most are able to be read over the course of 1-3 days. I genuinely haven’t read enough Lenin yet, I only read his Development of Capitalism in Russia which was very dry, Marx and Engels are great but I prefer Engels writing style to Marx

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m very partial to Lenin myself. I think that The State and Revolution, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, and “Left-Wing” Communism: an Infantile Disorder are three of the most important works written on the subject of why capitalist system cannot be reformed and how to take meaningful action to combat it. Lenin also writes in extremely lucid and accessible style in my opinion. His writing is short and to the point.

  • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Of Stalin, I’ve read Dialectical and historical materialism, which I should probably re-read, and I’ve read economic problems of the USSR and foundations of Leninism, which were not the most engaging works. I haven’t read much Mao or Marx. I have read some Lenin, State and revolution is really great, I love his easy to understand and engaging style, Imperialism is also really good, I love how he dunks on Kautsky, and gives so much evidence and explanation it’s impossible to deny his conclusions. Finally Engels is pretty good, I’ve only read a few chapters of anti-duhring, but I feel like he’s like Lenin with a little more philosophical jargon.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      On Authority was a key work for me as a budding Marxist. Socialism Utopian and Scientific was always a favorite too but I never remembered much because I only checked it in audiobook, I have a Marx-Engels reader that has it tho

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Lenin hands down. He had the ability to explain everything he wanted, from the nuances of party praxis, through marxist economic theory, obscure statistics compilations to even the philosophy. If you ever wondered why he was commonly called “teacher” even during his life, it’s this.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ll need to read On Contradiction because I only have his book of quotations which is nice, but kinda scattered and not organized by book, but by topic, which is kinda helpful in its own right, but doesn’t give a clear picture of how he writes

  • bluebodhisattva@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m a big advocate for Fidel’s speeches. He doesn’t fall in with the “four heads” theorists, and those speeches were probably collectively workshopped by the PCC, but I think they have a ton of continuing relevance in the western hemisphere.

  • frippa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lenin pretty much touched every point of Marxism, plus he’s funny af when she dunks on kautsky or the SRs, as far as simplicity I think Mao wins that front.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mao was so great with small but powerful quotes. Like shit that’s obvious when you hear it but you never think of it like that. He explained Imperialists as dust bunnies that need to be swept away. Okay I understand his point, then he drops a bombshell. Wherever the broom doesn’t sweep, the dust will not disappear by itself. The Communist Vanguard Party cannot sit idly by as Imperialists linger in their country. They must sweep away the dust before it builds up heavier and more difficult to get rid of. That blew my mind a bit, such a great analogy