• k_o_t
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    this isn’t a terribly helpful graph as it is now, because it’s impossible to tell how much of this comes from different things like hand-help electronics like phones and laptops, home appliances and most importantly electric cars, being the most popular in nordic countries, which could count as a lot of e-waste…

      • k_o_t
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        i’m not saying these should be excluded, but rather that the graph should somehow indicate these things

        for example, a person X in some country might be buying a 100 gram smarphone every year for ten years and change three gasoline cars in that period, which would result in a kilogram of e-waste, whereas a person Y in some different country could be using a single smartphone for this entire period and a single electric car in that period, which would result in a 2000.1 kilograms of e-waste

        this creates a false impression that a person X is less wasteful, i.e. this graph should be adjusted for the sources of e-waste