“On September 29th, 2023, we will ship out our final red envelope. It has been an honor to share movie nights with you. …We sincerely thank you for joining us on this amazing journey of 25 years.” -The Netflix DVD Team

With Netflix discs closing its doors on the 29th, where will you get your DVD’s, Blu Rays and UHDs?

This raises a few questions for discussion:

  • What services do you use?
  • Whats your experience with any of these services?
  • What do you do with your physical media?

I know, I know, yes, its 2023 and people still get physical media. A physical disc can have many advantages over a streaming service, such as:

  • Control Over Content
  • Quality
  • Sound Profiles
  • Extras
  • Back Ups

Here is a list of popular Rental and Buy services:

Rent:

Buy (New):

Buy (Used):

    • Hot Saucerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because tons of media that was never properly digitized for the streaming era and only ever ended up on discs.

      Doing it now will prevent a loss of history, much like early BBC recordings are lost because they would just tape over old broadcasts to save money.

      For example, there was recently unearthed a single episode of a sketch comedy show made by Graham Chapman and Douglas Adams.

      Problem was, the tape it was on was from the formats before VHS and Betamax. While the tape existed, no players to play back the tape existed anymore. It took a several year effort to build a new player from scratch. Finally, after all that, they were able to record the show to digital media and now it lives on YouTube for people to see. It’s not the funniest material ever produced by either man, but it’s definitely a piece of history worth looking at if you’ve ever enjoyed Monty Python or The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

      Attempts to digitize things that are currently available on disc but not available in digital file formats/streaming is absolutely a process of maintaining historical documents that would otherwise be lost to time. Building a new DVD or Bluray player from scratch when none exist anymore is a much bigger effort than making a tape video player, because it involves proprietary codecs, compression, and DRM.

      • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, I let others archive those and have digital versions of content I want. I get the appeal of discs, but I also get appeal of no discs (I’m in the latter camp)

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool and all, but that also has nothing to do with this. If these services are renting/selling CDs, they’ve already been digitalized.

        • Hot Saucerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It, quite literally, has everything to do with this.

          But keep pretending it doesn’t and like you know better without actually presenting any argument of your own.

          I’m sure that will work out for you. /s

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            You just replied to an argument of my own, nor did you say why it’s wrong. It literally has nothing to do with it, and it still doesn’t. If they sell it, it’s already digitalized. That’s all you need to realize that what you’re saying completely falls flat. Reread that simple comment again, and apparently this one as well.

            • Hot Saucerman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They’re digitized to very specific formats that are proprietary, and once the devices that play them cease to exist, so does the data contained on them.

              Digitizing them into a file format (which if you actually read the initial comment, would have noticed that I specified this) that is open, available, and easily transferable between a multitude of digital devices is a different issue.

              EDIT: I went back and bolded it for you, since you seem to struggle with reading comprehension.

              • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                elaborate on how these sites sell CDs that are apparently impossible to digitalize as standard video formats, because that doesn’t sound true at all

                edit: yeah that’s what I thought, maybe he realized on the third reply he completely misread the entire chain. Blocks me then continues to reply and edit all his comments lol. Very sane and definitely not emotional.

                • Hot Saucerman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Because I didn’t say that. Once again, your lack of reading comprehension rears its ugly head.

                  EDIT: it’s interesting that they think I blocked them. Is that what they wanted?

                  Very sane and definitely not emotional.

                  I’m gonna go with projection here. It’s not like they can’t see when I made my edits.

    • raubarno
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Japan, a large part of the digital manga/anime/videogames are still being released only on CDs/DVDs, no online access.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cuz I’m sick of not really owning my media. I have to hope the streaming company stays around, doesn’t magically lose records or my purchase, etc.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree! I’ve made a sea shift to optical media whenever easily possible. It’s such a breath of fresh air. Easy, reliable, high quality, not dependent on 15 servers between me and some hard drive in utah. Love grabbing a disc and knowing I’m gonna watch this and not have any dumb issues now or in 10years if I want to watch it again. If you haven’t touched disc in awhile, I urge you to give it a shot; I doubt you will be disappointed.

    • UndeadFoodSnob@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I sadly see a lot of doom and gloom on the horizon when it comes to streaming services as a whole. Prices will increase, Ads will become common place and limitations on how and when you view your content (Hardware exclusivity for example).

      Additionally, as others mentioned some media will just be lost to the ages. Many movies and shows will likely never come to a streaming service and are lost to time. Kevin Smiths Dogma for example will likely never come to a streaming service.

      Archiving and backing up a DVD, Blu Ray or UHD can be very valuable to a user even today. I run a personal JellyFin with over 1000 movie titles. Having instant access to a library like this can not compare to any streaming service in size or quality and it has zero subscription fees.

      But each to their own.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crazy, once you do back it up, then the CD becomes irrelevant. That’s what I said. CD’s being obsolete doesn’t mean streaming is the only other option, despite if the circlejerk reads it as that way. Reality and the market is what’s proving these as obsolete/

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not necessarily wrong, but you are unbearable.

      Just because a technology has been eclipsed, it doesn’t mean it no longer has value.

      Optical media is really the best choice for data archival. Magnetic media is far more subject to big rot. High quality CDs, DVDs and to a lesser extent Blu-ray Discs can last an order of magnitude longer.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Data redundancy exists, and tape backups is a completely different technology then CDs/DVDs/Blueray/etc, which is what this topic is about. Then I should be an easy block for you.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tape is magnetic media and doesn’t really last long at all.

          Optical media is also immune to many effects which would be likely to erase large amounts of data, such as EMP or solar radiation.

          Blu-Ray discs and DVDs which last as long as 1000 years can be obtained quite cheaply, and there are optical storage media which last indefinitely, but they’re expensive.

          Tape, hard drives, you’re lucky if they last 30 years.

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because not everyone has gigabit fiber run to their door. Streaming is not always the answer. I have read through all the back and forth here, but this is the point that was lost in the conversation. While it may be obsolete to you, it’s still the easiest way to transfer large amounts of data to someone that might not have any internet other than their cell phone service.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do these replies assume that streaming is the only other option lol. The emotional circlejerk is strong here. Digital formats are just better now.

        • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure what you mean. You said disc based media is obsolete, and I explained why it isn’t. I am not arguing about digital vs analog here. I am explaining why a form of digital media is still in use.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I don’t buy or rent a physical disc and I don’t stream the movie exactly how would I watch the movie?

            • andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The USB isn’t really a realistic option for a lot of people. As for downloading basically same problem as streaming, need a decent internet connection…

              My dad,with where he lives, the internet is so slow if he wanted to download a movie, it would take so long that by the time it would download he would no longer care to watch the movie…

              Which means he would have to find someone with decent internet, go to their house, download it. Then go home and play it. Again this isn’t an option for a lot of people. Including my dad.

              For a lot of people renting or buying a disc is really the only option to watch a movie.

              Some areas have even worse internet or none at all. To be able to reliably watch a movie means having the physical disc. Yeah they could get a data file and hold it like they do a physical disc just on a hard drive. But drives die a lot faster then a disc does. Plus they have to continously find someone to use their internet. Driving into town and going to best buy or Walmart it many times more efficient.

              If you prefer digital files compared physical disc great go for it but for a lot of people it just isn’t real

              • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Idk if you’ve heard in oppressive countries, but USBs filled with media is like a currency.

                https://www.unilad.com/news/usb-bottles-north-korea-kim-jongun-158902-20221206

                There’s similar stuff in India too. There was a campaign that sent a bunch of balloons over to north Korea with USB sticks and a ton of American movies on them.

                So they are definitely realistically used in a lot of places and can be reused.

                • andrewta@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  OK so in the US in the example I gave where would my dad to to legally aquire and download the movie?

                  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m just telling you that USBs are very much used as trading media in the real world, more so then you think. I don’t care about your dad lol. What is the point of this days old discussion right now, I don’t really care anymore