The Cyberspace Administration of China closed down the accounts the past month, following President Xi Jinping’s call to end the country’s food waste problem.
I wish that the United State had both leaders willing to devote bandwidth to issues like this, and populace that cared enough to think critically about their own habits.
I agree. I mean, some might say this is censorship, but you obviously don’t need mukbang videos and if getting rid of them helps the environment, then it’s kind of a no brainer.
I don’t mind censorship in this case either. If the speech/expression is actively harmful, then it absolutely should be censored.
I agree, which is why I don’t have an issue with just the concept of censorship. There are things that are better off disallowed.
I will also add that some kinds of expression that is just being (or could be) harmful to a single person is more than enough for something to deserve being hate speech and/or disallowed speech. Bullying for example.
I wish that the United State had both leaders willing to devote bandwidth to issues like this, and populace that cared enough to think critically about their own habits.
I agree. I mean, some might say this is censorship, but you obviously don’t need mukbang videos and if getting rid of them helps the environment, then it’s kind of a no brainer.
deleted by creator
I agree, which is why I don’t have an issue with just the concept of censorship. There are things that are better off disallowed.
I will also add that some kinds of expression that is just being (or could be) harmful to a single person is more than enough for something to deserve being hate speech and/or disallowed speech. Bullying for example.
deleted by creator
Still, there is a lot of personally harmful content (content that harms or could harm even one person) that should be in the hypothetical term too.
deleted by creator
Well there is content that isn’t strictly “hateful” but is still very harmful. For example, stuff involving sexual abuse or pedophilia.
deleted by creator