• @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
    link
    3
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I agree. I mean, some might say this is censorship, but you obviously don’t need mukbang videos and if getting rid of them helps the environment, then it’s kind of a no brainer.

    • @otso
      link
      3
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
        link
        3
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I don’t mind censorship in this case either. If the speech/expression is actively harmful, then it absolutely should be censored.

        I agree, which is why I don’t have an issue with just the concept of censorship. There are things that are better off disallowed.

        I will also add that some kinds of expression that is just being (or could be) harmful to a single person is more than enough for something to deserve being hate speech and/or disallowed speech. Bullying for example.

        • @otso
          link
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
            link
            24 years ago

            Still, there is a lot of personally harmful content (content that harms or could harm even one person) that should be in the hypothetical term too.

            • @otso
              link
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @AgreeableLandscapeOPM
                link
                2
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Well there is content that isn’t strictly “hateful” but is still very harmful. For example, stuff involving sexual abuse or pedophilia.

                • @otso
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  deleted by creator