• AgreeableLandscapeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I agree. I mean, some might say this is censorship, but you obviously don’t need mukbang videos and if getting rid of them helps the environment, then it’s kind of a no brainer.

      • AgreeableLandscapeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I don’t mind censorship in this case either. If the speech/expression is actively harmful, then it absolutely should be censored.

        I agree, which is why I don’t have an issue with just the concept of censorship. There are things that are better off disallowed.

        I will also add that some kinds of expression that is just being (or could be) harmful to a single person is more than enough for something to deserve being hate speech and/or disallowed speech. Bullying for example.

          • AgreeableLandscapeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            Still, there is a lot of personally harmful content (content that harms or could harm even one person) that should be in the hypothetical term too.

              • AgreeableLandscapeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Well there is content that isn’t strictly “hateful” but is still very harmful. For example, stuff involving sexual abuse or pedophilia.