• some_dudeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    But I also have to trust the server with my meta data if they open source it? Threema still has the advantage that they don’t need any personal information at all to create an account to the metadata can be as little as “key 1 send a message to key 2”

    • ster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      The metadata is who (IP address, so location) is contacting whom and how frequently they are doing so. Unless it’s P2P, which it doesn’t seem to be.

      It’s an inherently flawed system due to its centralisation. Check out https://matrix.org for a fully free and open source software stack where you can host your own instance and control your own metadata.

        • ster
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          ISPs are pretty cancerous, yeah. I mean even if you don’t host it yourself you’re susceptible to whoever you get to host your server and their ISP. You could use a VPN but you still have to trust the VPN provider. But ISPs have extraordinary amounts of metadata in almost every case anyway. In the UK ISPs are legally obliged to keep a list of websites that have been accessed.

          Self-hosting is normally better than not self-hosting, and decentralised is normally better than centralised. But this is because of freedom much more than it is because of privacy. For privacy the best thing is to not use the internet at all.