• OrekiWoof
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So people who create it can afford to live?

    • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I forgot not everyone knows what free software means. Free as in freedom not free as in gratis. The other one has good, even great reasons for existing as you’ve said people need to pay the bills. The first one does not.

        • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the english language has a problem with that. But not just English!

          Polish does too, the translation would be “Wolne oprogramowanie”. However wolne can be understood both as free and… Slow.

          Yeah, slow software lmao

          If you’d like to know more about software freedom checkout the Free Software Foundation, Software Freedom Conservancy, of course the GNU project and some Linux youtubers like Distrotube and the like.

      • OrekiWoof
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This definition of “free” in the context of software is used only in specific circles. It’s confusing for everyone else and another word should be used.

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps if we built a world in which no one needed to worry about necessities, it would not be even excusable to charge money for commodities?