• s20
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t seem to know what “lesser of two evils” means.

    It doesn’t mean “that guy’s bad, so the less evil guy is good, actually, and totally deserves our support!”

    It means “no matter which one of these assholes wins, I’m fucked, but if I’m lucky the one guy will use lube.”

    I can’t do a damn thing about the two party system. That ship sailed before I was born, and nothing I do as an individual can change it. In fact, I can’t see a solution short of possibly violent revolution. If that happens before I’m to old and feeble to help, great. Other wise, I’m fucked no matter who I pick, so I’m sure as shit going to pick the one who just wants to fuck me and not fuck me plus kill my trans neighbor.

    I’m sick and tired of being called stupid, gullible, or uninformed just because I can actually see how completely fucked we are. Your shit is great for people who still have hope. My shit is just trying to survive without the Gestapo coming for my neighbors.

    So come get me for the revolution. In the meantime, stop calling me stupid for being depressed and practical.

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to copy and paste this in reply to some other lemming that thinks I’m a gullible moron instead.

      • s20
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ugh. I’m not pro establishment. People who are pro establishment think it works. People who are pro establishment have hope

        Where the fuck did you get that out of what I wrote? Do I sound hopeful? Or like I think the system in any way works?

        Or is that just your canned response when someone disagrees with you and you can’t think of a decent comeback?

        Is that what you kids call a “cope”? It sounds like a “cope”. My generation just calls it “What the fuck are you even talking about?”

          • s20
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How. How am I doing that? I’m too tires to fight you, I’m just looking for information at this point.

            • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any legitimate vote is defacto consent for the system. The biggest stand you can take in a voting booth is spoiling your ballot with obscenities. It is abundantly clear that “harm minimization” doesnt work. Voting for a lesser of 2 evils is still voting for evil.

              • s20
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                So your answer is essentially don’t vote, or be really rude with your ballot in protest.

                Okay. I can do that.

                How does that help? What does it accomplish?

                • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The people counting the votes see the dissent. Low voter turn out delegitimizes the system. If only 30% of people voted it is easy to say the system is corrupt and that outside pressure is justified. If 30% of ballots are being thrown out it calls into question the entire system.

                  If “bad country” reported that 30% of their ballots were discounted the USA would slap sanctions on them and start banging war drums.

                  • s20
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The people counting the votes see the dissent.

                    Assuming they’re not machine counted, fine. What does that accomplish?

                    Low voter turn out delegitimizes the system. If only 30% of people voted it is easy to say the system is corrupt and that outside pressure is justified. If 30% of ballots are being thrown out it calls into question the entire system.

                    Okay. So say the system is “delegtimized” this way. What now? That doesn’t change anything as far as I can see. The asshats in power will just… keep being in power, because no matter how morally, ethically, or even rationally unjustifiable, the corrupt system is, it’s legal.

                    I’m/not saying you’re wrong. I don’t think you are. I just don’t see what it accomplishes.

                    In the long run, it means revolution I guess. But in the meantime, how do we stop old ladies from getting murdered over pride flags (to use a recent example)? Cristofascists and those that profit from them winning elections legitimizes their hate. It empowers the twatknuckles that support them. Even dumb crap like calling COVID the “Chinese Virus” spurs on hate crime.

                    How do we deal with that?

              • s20
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No. I’m not. That’s like saying that acknowledging the existence of the Chicago Bears means I’m a football fan.

                I’m arguing that the establishment exists and there’s nothing I can do about it. I’m arguing for despair.

                All I have left is harm reduction. Which is also 100% hopeless, but it keeps me from jumping off a building because no matter how ineffective it is, it’s fucking something.

                If you have a better idea, please. I’m all ears.

    • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      no matter which one of these assholes wins, I’m fucked, but if I’m lucky the one guy will use lube

      this is some scary logic if you think about it. Imagine you are a person, who doesn’t want to get fucked. Two guys are about to fuck you, even though you don’t want it, and you get the option to choose which guys fucks you even though you don’t want to get fucked?

      oh but the one guy is gonna use lube. To fuck you. The person who doesn’t want to be fucked.

      that’s insane.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The two Party system will only go of you get rid of the “winner takes all” system.