• @AgreeableLandscapeM
      link
      5
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      They don’t.

      While we’re on the subject, neither does Google.

  • @randomwords@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    1410 months ago

    Nothing Microsoft ever does should be trusted or relied upon. They are a bad actor who always operates in bad faith and should be treated as such.

  • @AgreeableLandscapeM
    link
    12
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    When someone says that Microsoft is NOT an ally to free software on /r/opensource, they’re almost ALWAYS downvoted. Then their prized company pulls this shit.

  • @klangcola@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    710 months ago

    Op article is from 2020.

    This Microsoft article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/what-is-maui is dated 30 January 2023 and still uses the MAUI brand name, so Microsoft have not fixed their mistake

    This should be a slam dunk case of copyright infringement for the original Maui project. Isn’t this the sort of thing EFF (EFFE?) should be fighting in the courts on behalf of small open source projects?

    • @klangcola@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      From the article (from original Maui’s response):

      a UI framework that as of today is still the first result in Google when searching for the term “Maui UI framework” but that due to the might of GitHub (another Microsoft subsidiary) and Microsoft own website (specifically, their blog) SEO that will change over time.

      Exactly this has happened. On both Google and DuckDuckGo (partially Bing?) all the top results are Microsoft Maui, you have to scroll down for original Maui

    • @nukul4r@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This was posted three years ago. My guess is that the recent replies made it show up in “hot” again. I see a lot of old posts with new comments recently.

  • @ufrafecy
    link
    3
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @AgreeableLandscapeM
      link
      3
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      This is LITERALLY their Embrace Extend Extinguish model. WSL (so in a way, Linux), GitHub, NPM, probably way more that I can’t think of right now will probably all suffer the same fate. They likely never changed their view on open source (remember when Steve Ballmer said that the GPL/Linux is horrible?) despite how many times they say they’ve changed it.

      • @ufrafecy
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

    • @fluffel
      link
      34 years ago

      Why not? They’re already owning npm, don’t they?

      • @ufrafecy
        link
        2
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

  • @k_o_t
    link
    2
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    in other news: water is wet