• BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Problem solving. Maybe we shouldn’t have pushed STEM so hard to the underpaid, unemployed, underinsured masses.

    -Somebody with the wherewithal probably

  • Tregetour@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    No, Mr Mangione! A Fortune 500 executive is a living, enterprising creature!

    I don’t care…heheheh <ebike swerves onto sidewalk>

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love how transparent the billionaire media is now. everything I’ve heard about this guy is a character assassination or speculative at best.

    they even mobbed the highschool he graduated from…EIGHT YEARS AGO. All to get some clips they can piece together to fit the narrative that he’s “a bad crazy man with a gun”.

    this shooting has certainly scared the fucking shit out of the aristocracy though. you can tell how scared they are by how hard the media is pushing the story of his capture.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Like he’s literally a comp sci nerd who reads books. Literally how can they make him into a bad guy?! everything I learn about him makes me even more down diabolical

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I admit I’m kinda disappointed. He pulled out almost perfect assassination that looked well thought out, managed to get away with only a few hickups in his plan as far as his face is considered, and then walks around with a murder weapon and a manifesto in his bag? Shame, really. All he needed was to lay low for a while, grow a beard and he’d probably be OK.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think this is why there’s a common narrative on the internet that this “evidence” was planted to frame a random dude.

      It’s fair to call that a conspiracy theory at this point, but hopefully due process will reveal the truth.

    • WamGams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You don’t understand.

      The fact that he wrote a manifesto meant he wanted to get caught. The taking the murder weapon and the manifesto to the McDonald’s was his way of saying he had gotten bored waiting for the cops to catch him. He pretty much turned himself in.

    • DrFistington@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t be disappointed. I guessed he was going to do this, and for good reason. His options were to either, live a life in fear, worrying that one day he would be caught, or, to basically give him self up, and elect for a Jury trial. Jury nullification is one os the most powerful tools available to the average, non-rich american. If he goes through the trial and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror), then hes a free man, a folk hero, and he sets the precident that killing rich murderers isn’t an automatic crime.

      What he’s doing is the smartest available option, please donate to his legal defense fund.

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror)

        Unfortunately this is not true. 1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they’d have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Have you ever been on a jury? In my experience it’s 2-4 strong personalities and a bunch of people confused by lawyer speak (because two confident authority figures are telling them to believe e two different things and they can’t reconcile the contradiction) and people who just want to go home and thus go along with the strong personalities.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      I almost want to believe this guy saw how similar he was to the photos and how famous the shooter was getting and decided to take the fall by wandering around in public with some incriminating circumstantial evidence until someone reported him so he could take the credit.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You’re supposed to grow the beard before and shave it off after. Its much faster to shave it off than grow it back

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The gun is planted. They just found a crazy guy in order to convince everyone that they actually found the culprit.

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I find that kind of unlikely. If they wanted to frame someone just to have a killer, they wouldn’t be talking about a “3D printed ghost gun”, but just use a regular gun. I, for one, haven’t known that it’s possible to 3D print a pretty well working, and silenced, gun. And that might inspire someone - acquiring weapons is the harder part of any such murder, assuming you don’t want to get caught, and the fact that you can get it without anyone knowing about it makes it way easier.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They know the guy is a engineer. They came up with the 3D printed gun because it fits with the character, and gives politician an excuse to ban 3D printers all together, “for our safety!”.

          I’m speculating and being a conspiracy theory, but in theory this could make sense. Nobody will ever find out the truth, I’m afraid.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Just yesterday this video of Mike Shake popped in my feed: https://youtu.be/tHzuz09l41U

          Essentially a sniper rifle with compressed air able to propel a 3d-printed bullet at sub-sonic speeds able to break a simulated skull. And it penetrated hard enough to for sure cause major complication for the target. Not to mention that lead slugs can easily be made DIY without much complications and skill. Lead can be melted pretty easily so lol.

          Not much to do besides being able to cut a pipe, make a release mechanism and compile it all with a projectile to shoot. Done is your makeshift weapon.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        To my knowledge, he claimed specifically the money in his bag was planted. Specifically they said there was US and foreign cash in his bag. The fact that Luigi is denying the cash but admitting to the gun and manifesto. To me I think he knew he was going down… but I would be far from supprised if the money was planted either to raise it up to 1st degree murder… or while I’m very far from legally qualified… if they could try and claim he was doing a job for an enemy of the US, could they buypass the trial?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve? Or is this a one-and-done thing?

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve?

          More dead CEOs, I guess. I’m down with that.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I doubt you will be when the costs of everything go up due to all the corporations hiring massive security teams.

            Something that doesn’t seem to occur to so many of you and something most of you have no response to. In fact, the only response I occasionally get is that it’s worth the cost, which seems to go against the whole reason for the assassination in the first place.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              How much do you think it costs to hire a security detail? I’m pretty sure security for the entire C-suite would be a tiny drop in the bucket for most mega-corporations.

        • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not that I’m fully on board with the theory, but you might be surprised how often “solving” a high profile case is placed above actually getting the right man.

          This is a publicity nightmare for the police, and getting someone in custody “achieves” placating the public and key stakeholders.

          Repeating things about this kids views on the Uni-bomber and referring to his writings as a manifesto “achieves” diminishing his status as a folk hero.

          So while I won’t endorse any particular theory until more evidence comes out, it wouldn’t be the first time putting a scapegoat in jail was deemed more important than letting people think the “perp” got away. Even if the hypothetical real shooter kills again, controlling the narrative can be it’s own goal in cases like this.

  • Nanite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Does the police media briefing affect his right to a fair trial? They mentioned his motivation and mindset and a note. Apparently he implied money had been planted in the charge hearing.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    379
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He also had a three-page handwritten manifesto that included grievances with the US healthcare system, a document that spoke to the suspect’s “motivation and mindset”, officials said.

    Publish it then.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    263
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reported by a worker at McD. Wtf, they’re the group that would benefit the most from a change in the healthcare system. Idiot.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      America’s working class has a long history of buying into propaganda and acting against their own interests. It’s a huge reason why the medical industry has gotten so bad.

      That being said, it’s important to keep our anger focused on the system, not people who are getting suckered by it.

    • squid_slime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Simply a lack of class consciousness. America has worked hard since the rise of the USSR to topple workers power through union busting and destruction of community.

      Basically we are built by our material conditions.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reported by a worker at McD. Wtf, they’re the group that would benefit the most from a change in the healthcare system. Idiot.

      Or, and hear me out here, we can view this with a little sympathy: there’s $60k in rewards for anyone who turned this guy in, and the person who did it makes peanuts at McDonalds.

      Now, I don’t know if I would do it, but I can completely and utterly sympathize why someone who makes poverty wages would turn class traitor for what almost certainly life-changing money.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Neat how that works. Keep the populace poor and they become a wall to wall surveillance system for you. And people worry about technology…

        • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          No way the average person working at Mcdonalds does anything but blow 60k even if they get it.

          Edit: To be clear, I spent 4 years working at one. Good people, bad people, but not much economic sophistication in either group.

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yeah, the fucking idiot will probably all blow it on something stupid like an ER visit.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            With the review bombing and public hatred of that McDonald’s location? Fired is more like it.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                The corporation? Definitely not. But review bombing and boycotting will hurt the profits of that franchised location, and its owner certainly will.

            • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I meant more like, that’s the best accolade you may get as someone working for McDonald’s. But yes, McDonald’s absolutely has a reason to support the status quo in terms of corporate rule.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’ll let him order anything he wants off the dollar menu!

          Which is really just a pack of fries, minus the fries at this point, becaues what store has a dollar menu anymore?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t. Might as well just be a cop if you think like that, plenty of room for bootlicking morons in that profession.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Here here. I’m poor as shit, got no insurance whatsoever, 60k would be somewhat life changing for me. I would never ever squeal on a comrade like that, even for millions.

        • FindME@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I remember correctly, they can be anonymous. If that’s the case, they wouldn’t really be easily taxable. Still, we are talking about the government here, and if they tax lottery winnings, I would bet they tax rewards.

      • halfatank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yea. The shooter and ceo were closer in class than the shooter and working class who supposedly called in so wouldn’t necessarily be considered class traitor

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some people think anyone whose parents actually owned a house are “the elites”.

          No. The CEO earned more in a year than even someone with a six figure salary would earn in a lifetime.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Maybe his family did, but judging by his work history, he wasn’t personally wealthy enough to be owning a country club.

              If he was “owns a country club” rich, his work history would mostly just say “Owner and CEO of whatever country club”.

              There’s no reason to work any sort of normal job if you have that kind of income rolling in.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          shooter and ceo were closer in class than the shooter and working class

          Ah, good ol’ “anyone who makes enough money to pay rent is part of the capitalist class, not the working class”

          • halfatank@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Family supposedly owns a country club. Prominent baltimore family. If that is so, that is definitely up there in the capitalist class and not working class. Still was rooting for him. Just would have alot cooler if was a working class guy.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              He was a white collar working class guy. His work history is full of positions at various tech companies working as an engineer. It doesn’t appear that he was handed any sort of dynasty.

              He was upper class, and he had better opportunities than your average American, but he was still a worker.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I guess people are saying that they believe there is such a thing as an ethical murder in the streets. Of course in any form of ethics vacuum chamber this can’t stand. But in the real world where children are bombed for the sake of some asshole’s religion, where the president boasts he could get away with murder in the street and courts confirm this, in a world where sick people are left to suffer to boost a share price, then, THEN an act like this becomes a reasonable response to an unreasonable world.

            Maybe someone better educated can tell me what ethics scholars have to say about how an ethical actor should behave in a system where ethics have utterly broken down. Right now, the crowd is saying “like that guy.”

            I’m ill-disposed to wag my finger at them, and think the only ethical course is to address the corrupt environment in which this act occurred, because that environment undermines any one-dimensional ethical evaluation of this murder in the street, and that makes me deeply uncomfortable.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            2 days ago

            To be charitable, other people can have different views on ethics.

            For example, if harming a CEO who helped raise claim denial rates from less than 10% to 30% results in revised policies and less overall suffering, that could be morally justifable to some.

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 days ago

            Vigilante justice indicates a failure in the system to administer justice.

            It is absolutely in society’s interest that someone who has caused deaths and misery of thousands is punished.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                2 days ago

                Luigi wasn’t really in a position where he could stop the CEO through any lesser use of force.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And that’s because it’s not his job to do so. Not every problem needs to be solvable by any given individual.

                  If he really was that passionate about the problem, he should’ve run for office to get into a position to solve the problem, or at least joined forces with some group that pushes for causes he believes in. Or started a business to compete with those businesses he disagrees with. Those would all be proactive steps he could take. Killing a CEO doesn’t solve anything, another will take his place, and surely he knew that.

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            What about the cheering on of murder in the street?

            Nah, that rich fuck had it coming, shooter is a hero.

          • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            2 days ago

            We have a president who says that he could do exactly what The Adjuster did, and get away with it. If the president can do it, why not this guy?

            I don’t like it, but this is our world right now.

          • Nate Cox@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The comment I replied to wasn’t cheering on a murderer.

            The comment I replied to was trying to convey that an impoverished person may feel like the reward money for turning in a murderer outweighs any moralizing over the murder itself. That the dollar figure could be literally life changing and they may feel they have no option but to turn them in.

            And people downvoted that. Hence my shaken faith in people’s ability to empathize.

    • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      $50k is 1-2 years pay for the person who reported him. For them, that short term relief was worth more than the highly improbable outcome where this man’s actions actually impact their life in a positive way in the next few months. Money wins almost every time

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      We can’t tell you who squealed, but it was one of the dozen employees at this McDonald’s. Probably the one that’s going to change jobs soon…

      I’d be pissed and scared if I was an employee at that McDonald’s

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Some of us aren’t brainwashed into bloodlust by marxist bullshit, even though we’re poor.

    • rasakaf679
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they rely on “tips” , as the corporation is unable to pay a wage that is sufficient to support a basic standard of living. If only capitalist weren’t so greedy they wouldn’t be relying on the tips to survive.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also worked there. There is no McDonald’s that has ever allowed tips. It’s against their corporate rules. I even saw an employee get written up for accepting a tip, once.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a picture of him holding a McD happy meal?? He had the gun and manifesto just laying there in his backpack? You f’ing kidding??

    Some elite fucks used an advanced AI search algorithm to search a bunch of people who vaguely looked like him. Input term search for social media and ‘reviews’ to further narrow down until you find someone who has a few tweets and posts that the media can point to say “yup hey look, he liked Kzynski’s manifesto on goodreads…got the guy!”. Plant evidence, and you got your scapegoat.

    This poor kids’ life is ruined. And he will probably be threatened if he doesn’t plead guilty and waive jury trial. He’ll get a visit from the MIB threatening to skin his family alive in front of him if he doesn’t play along.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Reading these fantasy takes is exhausting. It’s hard to want to be a part of a community that supports this guy by gaslighting everyone, saying things like “it’s not the same guy in the four photos!” Just hundreds of people all convinced they can secure this guys freedom by acting dumb and face blind- you’ve created a whole fictional scenario here that’s just unbelievable and unrealistic.

      If he didn’t want to get caught he shouldn’t have left DNA all over, shouldn’t have taken off his mask, shouldn’t be carrying the murder weapon days later… He could have helped himself but instead there’s an army of idiots who are probably just creating this fan fiction to impress their peers. It’s very childish though. This guy tried to do something which is commendable, or maybe he’s just mentally ill, but I’m just tired of reading all this nonsense. Who are you signalling to?

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I posted this elsewhere, but this is one of the few times I buy the conspiracy theory, not the official story.

        Dude pulls off a targeted assassination, gets away clean, trolls the cops with a bag of monopoly money, gets out of the state, stays essentially hidden for almost a week… And then gets clocked by some poor maccas employee and gets taken in with a manifesto AND a gun on his person?

        It’s the nazi flag and 3 copies of The Sims all over again, except this time the folks doing it are slightly more competent and actually pulled it off.

        This case is so important, so high profile, that they just need to arrest someone ASAP. Anyone. And that person is not in for a good time.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s a simple explanation: He wanted to keep on the move, and he wanted to be able to take down other targets.

        • fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          His face jas been plastered everywhere for the past week. My YouTube home page literally had 3-4 thumbnails of his face on every reload. Lemmy…X…news sites…massive exposure.

          So yah…some random worker notices his face looks kind of similar while he’s dining at his favorite spot and bam. Don’t forget there was a $10k bounty, plenty of fast food workers might be itching to collect on something like that.

          He probably figured once he was questioned about anything that they’d eventually get him so he prepared for that scenario. Or maybe this wasn’t even his last stop on his triple-D tour so he was still geared up.

          We’ll see him in court. If he’s innocent then he make a pretty good argument and then we can decide whether to raise eyebrows but this all just seems Q-anon levels of silly right now.

            • Defaced@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              $50k from the FBI?! You gotta be shitting me… If this happened to anyone of us the FBI wouldn’t give a single fuck.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        To be fair, people were posting actors who look like the very shitty pictures we have of the guy too, and I buy some of them. Honestly, the picture we have looks more like Timothée Chalamet than this guy. I’m not saying it isn’t this guy, or it is Chalamet, but there’s a shit ton of people in this world, and a lot look like the shooter.

        Edit to add: I’ll never trust the word of the authorities. They have to prove that this is the man. It’s their duty, not ours.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you look at a photo of the guy taken from above him, so a similar angle to the surveillance camera, he looks very similar. I do think it’s him.

        • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you will not trust authorities how do you expect them to prove it to you?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            2 days ago

            They’re going to have to take it to court and provide evidence. Trust is what you give to someone without the need for evidence. If they can prove it, then sure I’ll believe it. I’m not just going to trust that they’re correct without that though.

            • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Is there a reason to think there will be no trial and this guy by some reason will end up in some CIA black site without trial?

              I just find it interesting that someone who has absolutely no trust in authorities does not have a theory that court can be influenced by the same authorities.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                end up in some CIA black site without trial?

                No, he’d end up Epsteined. If the evidence were a plant, he’d be of no use to them alive.

          • Dupree878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Even if they proved it was him it doesn’t matter. When OJ was acquitted, Jurors admitted they did it as a fuck you to the LAPD and justice system.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand where you’re coming from. I was in your shoes about 15 years ago, hearing about “crazy conspiracies” or perspectives like mine and dismissing them as baseless and ‘fantasy’.

        My brother/sister, let me be crystal clear—both to you and anyone else who happens to read this: unless you’ve worked in my field, which I can say with near certainty you haven’t, then you haven’t seen, witnessed, or experienced the things I have.

        I say this in all seriousness: these people have unimaginable resources and capabilities. They possess the willpower and determination to execute plans like the ones I’ve described—and far, far worse. I’ve seen far more extreme measures taken for far less than what might be perceived as even a minor threat to the capitalist power structure. They’ve invested immense effort into building and maintaining this system, and I can tell you from personal experience that they’ll go to great lengths to protect it. This is not some wild fantasy or baseless conspiracy theory—it’s entirely within the realm of possibility, and is our reality.

        That said, I completely understand and respect your skepticism. I wouldn’t blame you if you don’t believe me. In fact, I’d expect you not to. Why should you? I’m just an anonymous person behind a pseudonym on a random discussion board, and I have no concrete evidence to present—only my word.

        Take from this what you will.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          unless you’ve worked in my field, which I can say with near certainty you haven’t, then you haven’t seen, witnessed, or experienced the things I have

          I’ll bite, what field are you in?

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think he knew he was going to get caught. Words on bullets, monopoly money… It’s trying to make the story larger and larger. Pretty sure he will make a show in front of the jury.

      I don’t know if that will work, but I respect that more than he killed the pig without making clear why.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can’t convince me this is the real shooter, this guy looks more like Skeet from Jimmy Neutron than the “Grin Reaper” in the now famous pic

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said this to many folks IRL, the guy the NYPD charges will not be the shooter. just some poor sap that gets sent to prison for life because he had a dissenting opinion.

        it’s the high price we pay to keep them in power.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      What would “the elites” stand to gain from framing this dude, while the actual killer is still on the loose?

      This is pretty unhinged, to be honest.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          By sending him to prison?

          That’s not really telling people anything they didn’t already know.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        The killer is not as dangerous as the approval for his act. The government wants to prevent copycat vigilantes by making an example out of him. Regardless whether this guy is guilty or not, they’ll drag him through the deepest mud and then string him up with the harshest possible sentence, to discourage others from gunning down CEOs.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I very much doubt the possibility of going to prison will deter someone pissed off enough to kill someone.

      • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not adopting the conspiracy here, but if they can’t find the shooter with the whole country getting behind him, then they would want the optics of finding the shooter. Which could backfire, of course. It would be very telling, for example, if the cops got real confident about it and then the real shooter made some kind of public display with the false shooter in custody.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, thats part of the reason I don’t buy it. If the actual killer acts again, it will be very embarrassing for the police.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This was my thought process, too. If they got a framed guy here, the actual CEO killer would likely or hopefully do something else to let the public know that they were still out there.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I get that. However, the optics of having a successful “martyr” symbol is very, very dangerous. A wide scope of narrative means difficult to control. Difficult to control introduces “motivator to action” symbols among a, I think, specific (and quite populous) demographic (think of all the young males with zero purpose, waiting to seize on an opportunity for a real life Mr Robot, for example)… “well if he could do it, get away with it, AND become a ’hero’, what’s stopping me from doing the same?”

        Having someone, anyone, buys time to craft the narrative and gauge public sentiment and, most importantly, dampen the probability of a revolutionary ’spark’ if you will.

        Obviously we don’t have enough information here. It very well could be the dude they have in custody. I am only sharing one possible theory based off my experience and observations. And there are a number of very suspect observations here that are in line with narrative management.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the actual truth is, this guy isn’t a criminal mastermind, and he got caught.

          He also looks a lot like the surveillance photo.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          He was an ivy league grad, vacations in Bali, and his family owns a country club and a chain of nursing homes. He almost certainly has more money than the guy he shot.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              He was CEO, not founder. The dude was only worth around $50 million. The shooters family owns a country club and an entire chain of nursing homes. They almost certainly have more money, probably a lot more money.

              I can’t answer your other questions. Perhaps the answers will be in his manifesto.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No way that he personally had more money than the CEO, from just looking at his work history. Maybe his whole family has more money than the CEO, but if we compared whole families against each other, the CEOs family would still come out on top.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And here’s your 12 jury members…

        Oh, it’s Mark Cuban, Mark Zuckerburg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch,

        …I could keep this joke going if I used google, but is it sad that I could name 6 people by memory just by using the parameters “Rich asshole who would have no empathy for the general public, and would absolutely convict”?

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          it would have to be 12 CEOs but they deff aint got to be proper owner oligarch… just scrape some middling f500 roaster with some “nonames”

          but yes valid point… but defense can generally strike some of these.

          this guy going to need proper counsel, I am assuming fun raising won’t be an issue. he deserves the best.

          coupled with proper PR campaign on socials since TV will try to destroy him.

          this jury must not convict because the glove don’t fit hehe

          • Norin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            Plenty of lawyers, at least some of them talented, will offer to defend him for free.

            It could make their career.

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              defense of this scale will require several million dollars, nobody will do that for free.

              also, defending this guy will make you enemy of the owner class. top talent will opt out.

            • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I am not going to watch 70 minutes movie, but according to brief skimming through the discussion it’s about business practice of the Microsoft from times of windows 3.11

              I am talking about his today’s undeniable philantropic work and the fact is he is really far from the rest of the people on your list.

              People are allowed to evolve and if every billionaire in the world would evolve I’m the same direction he did, world would be better place.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s a podcast and you can listen while doing other things. 70 minutes isn’t very long.

                You can deny his recent philanthropic work because his libertarian mentality corrupts it. He helped fund covid 19 vaccine research, but also demanded that the patents not be released, so profit could be made. This is in direct contrast to the lead scientist of the poli vaccine opening it up for anyone to make, comparing the ownership of a vaccine to trying to own sunlight.

                While there’s evidence that Gates did not participate in Epstein’s parties, he did know about and choose to stay silent.

                Gates is a full blown elite larping as a humanitarian when the role of his foundation should be occupied by a tax funded gov org.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fortunately in criminal trials if the Jury can return a not guilty verdict, that’s game over for the states case. Double jeopardy they can’t retry.

        Now if one guy on the Jury opposes a guilty verdict, and no verdict is reached, then the state can retry.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They could also go after him with Thompson’s family in civil suit to destroy him financially, which it turns out is not double jeopardy

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean… it does seem pretty fair? If the jury is hung it’s up to the state to retry. If the jury comes back not guilty then that’s the end of it.