Pretty much the title. I certainly believe Trump, Maga, the Military, and the Police will, sooner or later, probably sooner, get around to at least attempting to deanonymize and round up online antifascists and leftists and imprison them. How organized and effective that attempt is I am less sure of.

To be very transparent, this is something I’m pretty sure I’d be on the hook for. I have a long log of anti trump, antifascist, left sentiments, and am 75% sure I’ll be disappeared at some point in the next 4 years as I have no plans of shutting up. The only reason I’m not 100% sure is because of how expensive it would be. But hey, maybe it’s less expensive than potentially losing power? So I don’t know.

Never? Not likely? Maybe? Very? Extremely? Definitely?

Thoughts?

  • wes7ley@real.lemmy.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Personally, I would be worried if I was you. The first Trump term can’t be compared as he had some guardrails with his recommended cabinet picks from the traditional GOP. Now that those GOP members have been expelled from the party, those guardrails are no longer there. His cabinet picks are loyalists and is a stress test to weed out any non-loyalists in Congress.

    His cabinet picks will have free will to do what they want as long as they do two things: 1) praise Trump for the popular things they accomplish and 2) take the fall or blame other groups if it’s not popular.

    And it’s not the government coming after these groups that is most worrying. We all see the lengths regular citizens would go to right a perceived wrong. January 6 case in point.

    We’ve all seen this film before. It doesn’t have a good ending.

  • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not likely. This is hyperbole.

    What is most likely going to happen is that any right-wing, MAGA cultist and whatever. They won’t be penalized for any harassment or antagonizing behaviors committed by them to those they don’t like.

    That’s the reality.

  • Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Unless you’re doing actual organizing, unlikely. The DNC isn’t friendly towards Leftist orgs either, though MAGA groups themselves may become more millitant.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s very likely. Even if it was even remotely affordable or feasible he actually needs opposition to define himself and his base ‘ruggedly independent’ and as ‘freedom fighters’.

    If he’s going to go after anyone at all I think it will be high profile people for maximum media impact.

  • ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It all comes to how anonymous you are on the net. I’d say having a mainstream social media account is right now a high risk if you live in the US, specially considering that Kethamine Karen owns one one of them.

    This to say that deanonymizing you might be cheaper than you think, making it more likely than we all expect. If you want to keep using tnose socials, I’d start by deleting my accounts and creating new ones using new data (such as disposable mails or aliases that forward to your real email)

    Of course, a trusted vpn is a must in these cases. And there is a lot you should be doing on top of all this.

    Right now, if you want to keep your anti-trump line, be prepared to be treated as an enemy, so consider the deanonymation a highly likely possibility.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It isn’t November 2016 anymore. Trump has been president before and whatever you think of his first term, you already know (roughly) what tends to happen when he is president (if you are too young, there is a near-infinite amount of news articles, social media discussions, wiki articles where you can look it up). I somewhat understood fears like this in late 2016 when a Trump administration was an unprecedented phenomenon, but now?

    • Commiunism@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      This time is quite different, actually. First, he learned his lesson about hiring institutionalists as his secretaries and advisors since they would push back against more questionable ideas, now he’s surrounding himself with yes-men like RFK jr, Kristi Noem and the likes. There have also been precedents set like the infamous “official act immunity”, and just many more lessons learned from 2016 in general.

      There’s also just much more co-ordination now in general with the whole Project 2025.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But in 2016, he didn’t know what he was doing. He didn’t expect to win. It’s very different this time around.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And when do you think he started to know what he was doing? 2017, 2018, 2019, never? If not in any of these years, then why would he know it in 2025?