Summary

Donald Trump’s transition team has bypassed standard FBI background checks for key cabinet nominees, relying instead on private investigators, as reported by CNN.

This breaks decades-old norms meant to vet candidates for criminal history and conflicts of interest.

Controversial appointees include Matt Gaetz (attorney general), Tulsi Gabbard (director of national intelligence), and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (health secretary), all facing scrutiny for past investigations, pro-Russian views, or personal admissions.

Critics argue Trump seeks to undermine traditional vetting, with potential security risks tied to bypassing these checks.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Of course je did. How else is he going to appoint criminals and people with conflicts of interest ?

    Well call this process “efficient” and say that Musk came up with it in his big brain

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Given that last time they weren’t even real proper investigations, they were directed by the White House and didn’t actually look into things (in spite of Trump saying otherwise repeatedly), this is really only saving unnecessary spending.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well, the FBI agents are still getting paid and they are paying private investigators so I’m pretty sure these fake investigations are costing even more than the other fake investigations did.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Tulsi Gabbard as the head of intelligence means the US intelligence community will have a blind spot in Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East. Plus many field agents are going to die. It’s going to be massive set back for Ukraine. And she’s probably going to relay everything to dictators like Putin and Assad. Mahalo Tulsi /s. And fuck your sPiRIt of alOHa

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Talking about US funded biolabs, that are already public knowledge, is hardly evidence of being a Russian spy.

      Saying solutions in Syria need to involve Assad is common sense, not heretical.

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It turns out that the erosion of rights will be done for fun during the real task of butchering the federal infrastructure and agenci6snd selling them to the highest bidding friend

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s crazy that all these things I thought were laws my whole life turn out to just be “norms” that can be totally ignored

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, Cheeto is relying on private investigators…run by the Russian FSB. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, the Deep State is going to filled with neo-Nazis, religious nutters and Russian agents.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    So… About that “deep state” I kept hearing about for the past 30 years… Think maybe now it’s probably the time, if there ever was one, to do something to preserve the world order.

    Turns out the “deep state” are a bunch of rich people who don’t want to pay taxes. Oops.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The deep state was always meant to mean the FBI, FDA, EPA, and other agencies that while not always forces for good are forces of career bureaucrats that keep the United States a functioning nation.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I assume if they’re investigating or vetting anything it’s: will they be loyal to Trump? Anything good to hang on to as blackmail or extortion material?

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    to his supporters, this just looks like someone who gets things done. and they probably don’t trust the FBI

  • villainy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    2 days ago

    This breaks decades-old norms meant to vet candidates for criminal history and conflicts of interest.

    Come the fuck on. The FBI background checks are a “norm” too? Do we have actual laws for anything?

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    How much corruption can we take before he’s even installed? For real. This is way fucken nuttier than last time. It seems so malicious.

    • whithom@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      132
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      We will take whatever he gives. The US voters approved him. They want this. They chose this, and everything that comes from it.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        He got more votes than he ever did in the previous elections, and won the popular vote for the first time. God damn.

      • GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        77
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This. There is no authority above the authoritarian. His word is law now. Whatever Our Glorious Cheeto wishes is now US doctrine.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This is why we’re supposed to have separation of powers. Any competent senate, even if the same party would insist in this before confirming. A senate full of sycophants on the other hand ….

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats not true. There are at least 71 million people here who voted against it. Thats a lot of people.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          There were even more who couldn’t be bothered to get off their asses and vote at all. They stood by and allowed this to happen without caring enough to try and stop it.

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I have a friend who says “I’m not political” and I’m just what? So you don’t have any opinion on whether immigrants should get fucked or gay people should have rights? His position is “I see so many families and friends torn apart by disagreements so I’m just not political”. Okay. It makes me think he’s kind of a dolt. I don’t feel like it’s possible to not have an opinion on social issues at the least.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Plenty of voter suppression in swing states, like unenrolling people from voter registration lists. Also the ongoing issues like 4 hour lines in urban areas, due to not enough voting facilities and machines, and short or no lines in rural areas and suburbs. Also, how it’s easier for people with certain types of jobs to go vote but hourly workers etc have a harder time getting there since voting day isn’t a holiday.

          • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Also people who didn’t vote at all, are at minimum fine with Trump and not against him.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It seems so malicious.

      I guess he was being honest about all that revenge talk, eh? I mean, it is actively and onerously malicious, but just like last time, everyone’s just gonna let Trump steamroll them, because the federal government has long had hesitance to hold figures like presidents, senators, and supreme court justices to account, and this is just an extension of that.

      I mean, we didn’t prosecute Bush and Cheney for war crimes. Hillary Clinton was proud of her friendship with Henry Kissinger. Kamala Harris was proud of her endorsement by Dick Cheney.

      “It’s a big club and we ain’t in it,” but Trump and co. don’t feel the need to put up the facade anymore.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        “It’s a big club and we ain’t in it,” but Trump and co. don’t feel the need to put up the facade anymore.

        Bingo. Instead of “hiring” (paying off) politicians, they’re just doing it themselves. They’ve lost any and all care about keeping up appearances. After all, what are we going to do? Sue them?

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        the federal government has long had hesitance to hold figures like presidents, senators, and supreme court justices to account, and this is just an extension of that.

        Because if they start holding others in similar offices to account, they might have to hold themselves as well, and that ain’t happening.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      The 4 years of Trumpsanity isn’t starting in January, it’s starting right now. For fucks sake, I’m not ready yet. I need to start stockpiling popcorn and booze. Except this time I’ll probably need less popcorn and more booze because I don’t think it’s going to be as stupid funny as last time. It’s already not funny, it’s been nosediving into “could it get any worse?” and so far the answer has been “Yes!”.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It annoys me a lot when people I know say “Trump is funny”. Not really… he’s a whiny, conceited asshole. He might be somewhat amusing if he wasn’t the President. As it is, this isn’t funny at all.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Trump himself wasn’t funny, but he would come across as funny because he would say the stupidest things or act in an unprofessional way. For example when he said the experts should look into if showing light inside a human body would kill COVID or maybe injecting disinfectant might work, that was stupid funny. There were others like the “who knew healthcare is so complicated” statement

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s funny in a way but still horrifying since someone that narcissistic and ignorant is in charge of the government.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 days ago

    A crook and convicted felon fills his cabinet with folk who probably can’t pass an FBI security screening? Color me shocked.

    The robber barons are back, baby

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gabbard is the biggest threat here, in my view.

    You couldn’t dream of putting a spy in a better position than the DNI whose position is literally to oversee all intelligence agency silos.

    Russia will know literally everything.

      • azuth@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not to defend those nutjobs but ‘religion’ (aka cults that reached critical mass) are far more dangerous, whether Catholicism or mainstream US Protestantism.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not at all true. These are cultists who would happily march queer people into gas chambers and don’t make a secret about it.

          This is a Nazi cult. This is super fucking dangerous.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Dude there are certainly more Americans that would happily march queer people into gas chambers and don’t make a secret about it while being Christian.

            There already are “conversion” camps run by Christians for queer children. They are horrendous.

            Were hatred against queer people not normalized by Christianity her cult would be unable to use her to persecute them.

            Also, some Christian denominations are not troubled by someone being a Nazi.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Okay? And plenty of Christians are not like that at all. And I say that as a life-long atheist.

              This is like saying the KKK isn’t extra dangerous because lots of non-Klan members are just as racist.

              You’re really missing the point here.

              Also, you don’t have to tell me about conversion therapy camps. We’re getting my daughter out of this country specifically because Trump selects people in dangerous bigoted cults to be in his cabinet.

              But sure, she’s not dangerous at all. Not compared to 10 out of 10 Christians, all of whom hate queer people, including the Christians who are themselves queer.

              • azuth@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                I am not missing the point, you are, by miles.

                That cult is less dangerous than Christianity. You don’t fear them, you fear an extremely anti-queer government. That government will take power due to Christianity’s influence. Those cultist might be invited along for the ride.

                But sure, she’s not dangerous at all. Not compared to 10 out of 10 Christians, all of whom hate queer people, including the Christians who are themselves queer.

                Not, all Christians hate queer people. It’s irrelevant if they do not seriously try to stop the ones that do from promoting hate. Which most Christian denominations officially do, for most of them any queerness is a sin. Which explains why even non hateful Christians will not seriously challenge the more extreme ones.

                As for queer people who identify as Christians, that’s not an argument in your favor, for Christianity being less dangerous. Christianity has probably driven more queer people to suicide for not being “good” Christians than this cult could even dream of hurting. It gets people to run conversion camps and parents to send their own children there. It probably also keeps good people who would otherwise help queer people from helping.

                So yeah Christianity is far more dangerous than some nobodies.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Some nobodies? Her genocidal cult is now going to be officially part of the U.S. government. Why does this not bother you just because there are lots of bigoted Christians as well?

                  Christians have been in charge of the United States since its inception. The current president is a devout Catholic. Queer people have been getting more and more rights despite that.

                  By your logic, queer people are in less danger now that this genocidal cultist can get all of their private information because she isn’t a Christian. Is that really what you think? Queer people will be safer under Trump? Or are you going to argue that Trump’s professed Christianity is genuine?

                  And your “queer Christians hate queer people” argument is also noted.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump is just putting a person between him and Putin this time around, Russia knew everything the first admin also. He hid meeting notes and visitor logs and nobody did shit, then the assholes voted him back in to finish selling us off because somehow that means “America First”.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s amazing how Republicans manage to brand all their shit as the complete opposite of what it really is.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      "Nikolai Patrushev, part of the Russian president’s inner circle and former Secretary of the Security Council, told the Russian newspaper Kommersant that Trump was duty-bound to act on his words.

      Patrushev said: “To achieve success in the elections, Donald Trump relied on certain forces to which he has corresponding obligations. And as a responsible person, he will be obliged to fulfill them.”

      So yeah, sounds about right.