• TheOubliette
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It means supporters of the dominant ideology if capitalism, just like it has always meant.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not at all true. If you’re referencing US ideologies of Capitalism, holy shit are you wrong and read the wrong Wikipedia.

        In fact, the Democrats since the 60’s have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism. Republicans are the pro-capitalist party in the sense they want to privatize everything and help their friends, and also “deregulate” anything and everything.

        These are anti-capitalist ideas.

        Come on back with some more Wiki links, good buddy.

        • Grapho
          link
          fedilink
          Español
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          In fact, the Democrats since the 60’s have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism.

          Bruh what world are you living in lmao. Obama reached to bankers uncaringly tanking the global economy by giving them money to do with as they wished (and, as always, they wished to give themselves a bonus).

        • TheOubliette
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not at all true. If you’re referencing US ideologies of Capitalism, holy shit are you wrong and read the wrong Wikipedia.

          I am quite correct, though I am referring to liberalism in the general internationa sense. This is what liberalism always has been. You must understand it as what it is and has done, not what it tells you it is meant to be. As Stafford Beer said, it makes no sense to think that the purpose of something is what it consistently fails to do. The liberalism of the enlightenment had in its right hand brutal, racist colonial exploitation and in its left a ruthless industrial revolution chaining the people to factories and removing them from all commond and property. It is a product of capitalism itself.

          In fact, the Democrats since the 60’s have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism.

          The Democrats are a capitalist party and always have been. They do not work against capitalism at all, they support it and protect it. There is really such thing as late-stage capitalism, it is just capitalism developing over time, retaining most of its qualities but taking on new angles. Buy if it does mean anything, it means neoliberalism wrought by financialization, and that is Democrats’ main political base. It’s their main thing, especially as an export.

          Republicans are the pro-capitalist party in the sense they want to privatize everything and help their friends

          Democrats also do this they just tell you it is efficiency and “public-private partnerships” and “a generous endowment to a public institution” (that they can now defund). The charter school movement is largely Democrats, for example. They simply have different factions on their chopping block, different groups to pander to.

          These are anti-capitalist ideas.

          What ideas are anti-capitalist? I didn’t see any.

          Come on back with some more Wiki links, good buddy.

          No thanks. Read the political philosophers of the enlightenment, colonialism, industrialization and proletarianizatikn, the liberal revolutions in Europe, and who emerged to identify themselves as anti-liberal once those revolutions established their ideologies as mainstream, namely monarchists, fascists, socialists, and anarchists. You cannot gain a political education through Wikipedia, it is a Cliffs Notes approach to social topics often written by often incorrect or heavily propagandized (or propagandist!) People, including literal Nazi apologists.

          • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            thought-terminating cliché

            There’s no argument, it’s the definition of the word. Why do you assume there should be argument around the normal usage of a word?

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              because for some reason, torvalds is bad now because he is a capitalist while nearly everyone is a capitalist. that’s the argument made.

          • TheOubliette
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I dunno how you can terminate a thought that never began

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]