• TheOubliette
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dunno how you can terminate a thought that never began

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      thought-terminating cliché

      There’s no argument, it’s the definition of the word. Why do you assume there should be argument around the normal usage of a word?

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        because for some reason, torvalds is bad now because he is a capitalist while nearly everyone is a capitalist. that’s the argument made.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          A capitalist is someone who owns capital, not someone who supports capitalism. A liberal is someone who supports capitalism. I don’t think Linus is a liberal, given that he’s the Linux guy. But he’s obviously a capitalist, and that’s okay, that’s something you should strive towards if you live under capitalism, even if ideologically you oppose capitalism.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]