• Plume (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1.04K
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    People. We, the French, pulled a left-wing coalition out of our asses in less than a week and managed to “win” an election. You have months. Hope is permitted.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    800
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand you people in this thread.

    Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down from the presidential race and give the place to someone else.

    Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing? Are you for real? They’re doing EXACTLY what people have been asking for. They’re doing EXACTLY what needs to be done if they want to win.

    Fucking hell you guys, make up your fucking mind.

    Sincerely,

    A Canadian with severe anxiety over your next presidential election.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      285
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, to be fair, he should have stepped down a year ago, or at least 3 months ago. I vaguely remember him saying he was going to be a 1 term candidate in 2020.

      Anyway, I respect Biden. I honestly think he was a better president than Obama, Bush, Trump and Clinton. Perhaps the best since Carter or JFK.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Many of the people involved in such agitation are not arguing in good faith. They simply want to attack the ‘libs’ at every opportunity, and reality be damned.

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      One thing I appreciate about Canadian elections is how quickly they happen. An election is called, campaigning is like a month or two and then we find out the new government just hours after casting our votes.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This was an astroturfing campaign covering our media and also via bots on social media.

      I watched the debate and while he was slower, and mixed up words he actually was aware of US goals and challenges (despite what media tried to imply), trump was more energetic but he was constantly spewing nonsense, and while part of it was lying as usual, part of it was clear that he was actually getting lost.

      I even wrote that in certain that if Biden steps down the same bots will start campaign how Democrats were cheated to discourage them from voting (like it was worth Bernie).

      I’m definitively voting for Kamala now no matter what ridiculous bullshit they will come up on her on September-October (you can be sure there will be some scandal that will turnout to be nothing burger after election). I got fooled (like a lot of people) in 2016 to vote 3rd party and we got trump.

      Republicans are actually a minority they can only win if they discourage enough people from voting. That’s why they are against laws that that make voting easier.

      I actually was hoping Biden would run as he has great experience with foreign leaders as well as very successful reaching compromises and passing bills that otherwise wouldn’t fly.

      As I say though I will 100% vote for Kamala (or whomever will be the democratic candidate), definitively not the fascist party and in fact anyone on Democrats side looks good.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m excited AF… maybe the people you’re reading are republican plants that are just trying to make it feel like chaos.

      The fact that this happened the weekend after the RNC makes me feel it was very well planned.

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not speaking for the rest of the thread, but…

      1. Biden should have said he wasn’t up for reelección since day 1
      2. The Democratic Party hasn’t known what to do since the 2016 election… at least.
    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s been chaos in the comments for a while now this is just catharsis for a lot of people and reaffirming for some of the naysayers.
      You are gonna see a lot of takes from a lot of terminally online types.

      Now just comes the actual work and it’s gonna look chaotic for a while. I hope we get it together.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down

      Yes, some.

      Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing

      Yes, others.

      Different people speak up on different days. This is especially true in social media where often people won’t speak up if they know they’re going to get jumped on.

    • Juigi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean many here openly support Putin too, what can you do

    • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      The fact the the DNC didn’t have a contingency plan while running the oldest candidate ever is just insane.

      The DNC has been fumbling for years and years now. Anyone else remember 2016?

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      All of this should have been done a couple years ago for presidential hopefuls to gather resources and prepare for the elections. The assumption that Biden was seeking a second term stalled a lot of minor steps needed to build a campaign. Biden stepping down a month before the DNC is gonna be a shit show. Who’s gonna run for becoming a candidate? How are they gonna fundraise quickly enough to get the word out? This is a clusterfuck of poorly timed decisions and I only hope the new candidate can gather enough support to win the presidential election. Given the Democratic party’s penchant of favoring people from their inner circle, I doubt they’ll be well received by the general public to begin with.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Personally the best news I’ve heard in a while. I think there is a little bit of a knee jerk reaction happening because a lot is on the line and people are scared because it’s such an unknown right now. When things settle more and the smoke clears I think everything will be more positive.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s just an anecdote, but I’ve experienced a lot of people saying “I’d vote for a dead dog over Trump”, who for some reason still wouldn’t back a democrat that didn’t look like and sound like a mummy.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I personally just said last week that I believed only Biden was capable of beating Trump, so I’m feeling pretty sick right now. God, I hope I’m wrong.

      We haaaaaavvvvvve to see this example and set a damn age limit for people to hold such high positions in our country. Old dude may have very well just sent us down an irreversible and utterly destructive path by seeking the office in the first place.

      I know Bernie Sanders is old too, but damn I wish he had won the nomination. We wouldn’t be in this crisis right now. Still though, it’s a gamble electing people who are already waist deep in their grave.

      Man

      What a strange and historic month this has been. We’re all living in a very big moment in history right now, just, all the way around.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think people are angry about the timing. It feels like too little, too late. If he had made the decision at the beginning of the year, then sure. But now it’ll be rushed, and people won’t be able to agree on a single candidate. And people are worried that, due to the resulting lack of agreement, a split vote will hand the win to Trump.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes some of us been paying attention to who is backing him and who wasn’t. Some of us had noticed that all the leftists in the party were still behind Joe Biden while all the neoliberals weren’t. Some of us have noticed that the president who has protected worker rights and expanded consumer protection and wants to tax the wealthy is getting pushed out by the corporate Democrats.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think part of the reason it feels like “wtf are you doing?!?” is because we were really saying “Joe needs to step the fuck up or step aside” and then in the last week he’s thrown some absolute hard hits at Trump making it look like “holy shit, we got old Joe back!”. Then suddenly after appearing to wake up, he goes “nah, I’m good.”.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad he’s stepping aside. But it’s been a bit of a rollercoaster and not a very consistent message. They kept telling us to shut up and follow Biden and anyone who doesn’t is supporting facism and then suddenly, “nah, not Biden, it’s cool”? You can’t pump a rhetoric machine up and then expect the brakes to stop it instantly.

    • ipkpjersi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think it’s the same people wanting him to drop out vs sad that he did drop out. Or they did want him to drop out because he’s aging but they are sad that he did because he was a good president.

  • Xanis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    456
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ll say just one thing:

    Every single one of you assholes who wouldn’t shut up about him stepping down since the dude missed the toilet bowl fifty years ago after a particularly wild night out better sure as fuck step up now that Old Joe has stepped down.

    A sitting god damned President of the United States has stepped aside less than half a year before reelection. Make no mistake: The man swallowed his pride and ego HARD to make this decision. Let’s honor that by creating a wall of votes so god. damned. thick. Riley Reid would gasp.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    288
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I know people will say this is bad, a new campaign will be rushed, etc. But I think we all know Biden was an excuse for many not to vote, or worse, to vote for Trump. Withdrawing will be his legacy when we win, not his failing.

    Thank you President Biden. You are a hero.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      137
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Biden absolutely did the right thing and, perhaps, the most courageous thing.

      Democrats would have coalesced around him if decided to keep going but we’ve been begging him to step aside. This is a key difference between Trump “fans” and Biden voters. We’re not drawn to him as a personality.

      Once a candidate is selected, I don’t care who it is, we must support them because not doing so is voting for an end to democracy.

      The fact that we’re here is a travesty.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 months ago

      People have done more with less campaign time and he will go down as having listened and done what was requested of the people and party I honestly think this says a lot of good stuff about the democratic party and Biden once we get the spin right.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It won’t be hard. Kamala is going to be able to put a bullseye on Trump and republican politics like Biden simply wasn’t ever able to do. She’s going to be able to hyper focus on the deeply unpopular beliefs of the base and it will be hard for Trump or others to really deny it without losing their core supporters.

        Further, because she’s relatively unknown there’s really not the same baggage as there was with Hillary. Most people don’t know who she is and I think that really plays to her favor.

        • ulkesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let’s be honest here, Trump will never lose his core supporters. He could literally turn out to be the devil incarnate, and his supporters will say it’s their god’s will. He’s a 34-count convicted felon and they see that as something to boast about.

          The issue in this country is that the less educated are following those with a playbook of getting the less educated to vote, to vote for them, and in areas that games the electoral college system.

          We were a hair’s breadth from another Trump term in 2020 by 11,000 votes in GA. Not to mention his coup attempt.

          It cannot be that close again. It must be decisive. I hope Harris, if she is the nominee, can achieve that.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Kamala is going to be able to put a bullseye on Trump

          I agree with you but this is an interesting choice of words given other recent events lol.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’ll be great to have a woman talking about abortion and making this election a referendum on national abortion access.

      Americans love to vote for something rather than against something.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Nobody who would consider voting for Trump is going to vote for whoever replaces Biden. Nobody. This is about getting apathetic voters off their butt. Which I hope works, but every part of my being is telling me they’re going to pick someone who apathetic voters wouldn’t vote for anyway.

    • jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m so thankful I live in a country where 4 months is (still) believed to be a ridiculously long amount of time to campaign.

      Good luck America! Please show the rest of the world you’re still capable of making sane choices.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except for the bank of those who are just Russian agents who will undoubtedly find some new “excuse” why the Democrat candidate is not fit to run.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Expect lots of “cop” comments in regards to Harris from Russians totally real leftists.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          She was a cop. She called herself the “top cop”. I fucking hate the police and she’s got my vote over a literal pedophile felonious fascist.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m no fan of cops, but I think this actually plays very well with the political environment. Recent elections saw rebukes of progressive Police policies in the Pacific North West. As much as I wish it were otherwise, that message isn’t resonating with voters even in considerably progressive areas.

            Having a traditional prosecutor may be an advantage in that regard. And it may provide us a new avenue to look at how we can have better policing that more people will support.

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fwiw, I am harshly critical of most elected dems but I have never considered not voting. I think I and many people hold our allies (for lack of better term) to higher standards and get angrier when they fuck up. So I think a lot of these posts are just that. Harsh criticism of a candidate =/= not voting for them. People are strategic about voting pragmatically, they’re just also very frustrated with the dem establishment’s behavior.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Giving up power is way more respectable than trying to hold onto power. Something Biden’s opponent, now Harris’s opponent isn’t good at.

      There’s a lot of people that are old and don’t follow politics all that closely. Biden’s story of having to accept that he’s gotten too old to do the things he wants to do is a story they can relate to. The guy they can relate to most is endorsing Harris. It’s not like he’s gone. He can still make speeches about how the GOP wants to cut Social Security and his friend Kamala won’t do that.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      But, when democrats lose due to this move… ???

      I would have preferred him to stay on course. While I don’t care what sex they are or color or whatever, a fuckload of garbage twats in this country sure as fuck do. Biden was also likeable in public appearances. I have fuck all idea what Harris is like, and 5y of time vs like 4 months to win public opinion, oof it will be an absolute blitz. And I consider myself rather knowledgeable and up-to-date on US politics. I have friends that have no idea what’s going on at any given time, or why.

      I need to research her now and become familiar, but I see this as a big negative for chances, not positive. Anxiety spiked hard about what’s to come.

      Anyone in Canada looking for a roommate…?

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        While I don’t care what sex they are or color or whatever, a fuckload of garbage twats in this country sure as fuck do

        This is my least favorite argument I keep seeing for why Biden shouldn’t drop out. The racist shit-heels you’re referring to were always going to vote for Trump regardless of who the Democratic candidate is. There is no reason for Democrats to try and appeal to racists, and even if there were it would be immoral to do so. Sacrificing your values to win is no true victory.

        You’re losing your nerve, and while that’s understandable, it’s self-sabotage.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wouldn’t say I’m ‘sacrificing values’, more like “woman bad, no vote for” is strong here still. Yeah yeah ‘we will see how it goes’ but that’s exactly what fucking scares me, we don’t get a “best 2 out of 3” save, and we need fucking EVERYONE on board to avert catastrophe.

          I’m in a swing state and it’s like a sea of Trumpers and I’m just like “yeah, we are fucked”.

  • fubarx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    239
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    The biggest hot-topic issue this election should have been abortion (and by extension, SCOTUS). But the discussion got side-tracked by all this talk of old age. The debate just reinforced the narrative and concern with Biden. They would have hammered him over and over, with Trump bragging about how quickly he recovered from an injury.

    Now, we have:

    • A sittingVP with actual Whitehouse experience, who can take credit for all the economic policies under Biden. Also, a former Senator.
    • A prosecutor and former Attorney General vs a convicted felon.
    • The age issue disappears (in fact, it now becomes a liability against Trump).
    • A woman vs the guy who bragged about killing Roe v. Wade.
    • Future of SCOTUS.

    If she just keeps talking about those topics non-stop, she’ll do fine.

    The only thing better would have been if Biden had resigned to let people see her in the actual role, but this works. She picks a mid-westerner as VP who can stand up to Vance and it’s a whole new ballgame.

    I’m actually stoked about this race again.

  • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well guys… Have you seen Trump’s mental decline since he last ran?! How old is he now?

    Surely nobody would be dumb enough to vote someone that old into office now… That is… What we have been saying? Right guys?

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    196
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s why I’m never gonna cancel my USA subscription. Your shows always have a crazy twist right before the season finale.

    Jokes aside: Not a single person who even considers voting for Trump is worth any hassle. Their vote is a coin flip on fucking acid. The dems should try to animate the lazy nonvoting pricks.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      213
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would be an awful lot easier than trying to salvage Biden’s image as it stands. If they do it right this should be super easy, but if they drag their heels on the changes necessary then it might be a lot harder.

      This is BIG opportunity to rebrand and show what really matters to the party.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        83
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is the perfect opportunity to do that! But I have absolutely zero faith in them actually doing that.

        But maybe I’ve become jaded in my age with politics. Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

          Her turn 2.0 watch out yall here comes Hillary! /$

          • Fisk400@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            3 months ago

            Are they going to force Biden to run against his will or what is the plan here? If Biden dies, are Democrats not allowed to run at all because they aren’t allowed to replace him.

          • Nurgle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            Dems haven’t even officially nominated anyone yet, dont think the republicans would get very far with that stunt

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                If you think they’re that off the rails then they don’t need this as a premise to challenge Democrats in the first place.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            The thing is, it’s not the Democratic Party replacing Biden anymore. Biden has willfully stepped down, and given his support to Harris. To put it another way, Biden is no longer “being replaced”.

            But, that may not matter in the long run. The question now is when/if Republicans take this to court, and whether or not the judge decides to hear the case or not and how long that will take.

            As far as I know, judges have historically decided not to pursue a case if it would impede the election process (e.g., gerrymandered district ruled illegal, but still used because not enough time to redraw maps). I would like to hope that the Democratic Party gets the same curtsy in this case.

            However, I feel that right now given the current political climate, and the current way judges have been deciding in favor of the Republican agenda, this may not be the case and the new candidate will be tied up in legal tape to be able to campaign properly. The Republicans will cease upon this opportunity and use it against the Democratic Party to make them look weak and unable to do anything they say they will do. And to be honest, they won’t be wrong.

            Democrats are their own worst enemy, and their hubris will be to all of our detriment.

            https://youtu.be/-lm0Cy8gwvk

          • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            from the article

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah it was going to be impossible to properly move forward from this. There would be too much media coverage and division and lingering questions.

        Now though, we have a real opportunity to unify, and make several arguments to voters – Democrats listened and picked a younger candidate. We can also flip the script on candidate age now

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      If, and that’s a big if, they choose to field a moderately likeable replacement, there’s a chance they can actually re-energize the campaign and voters and get a big boost with a fresh face. That’s a big if though.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes they can. This is the right choice. Democrats will be more energized than ever now. Hopeful they keep it open to the delegates to vote at the convention after a few people step forward.

    • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Other countries have pulled out elections in two weeks. The us may not have that experience though. The campaign however had been directed at his opponent’s well known incompetence and malice. That may be the advantage of divisive politics.

    • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Other countries have whole campaign seasons that are shorter. We’ve just gotten used to multi-year campaigns and never-ending reelection efforts. It wasn’t always like this, and I don’t think it’s good for us long-term.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      They have the media bomb of “no incumbent” leading the headlines. This is one of the only media maneuvers that would change the conversation from “That Trump overcame assassination and adversity!” At this point a major shift was needed.

      The year and a half back log of memes against Biden that right wing contractors have saved up are now worthless. The right will have 3 months to make a cohesive media smear campaign (which they can do against the right candidate) but it will require lots of downtime as the high paid think tanks make astroturf.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        The fact that Republican troll farms have to now spend time coming up with new material puts a small smile on my face.

        They will move swiftly though, while the Democrats are used to being sluggish, so vigilance is in order.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plenty of other countries’ electoral campaigns advance far faster than Americans expect theirs to move, and US media is talking about politics all the damn time. If the Dems don’t do a massive screw up somehow, I think they’ll find out that switching the candidate will be far easier than they were expecting.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Biden was going to lose to Trump and was dragging other Democrats down with him in the polls. What more did you need?

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            69
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Not for nothing but four months should be plenty to do an election in. 24 hour news media has convinced you that it’s got to be a 2-year endeavor. In all honesty 2 months should be plenty. Four is fine. Our entire country would be much better off if election seasons were shorter.

              • tamal3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Smaller country, less money involved… but here’s hoping.

                Edit: I’m not sure why I’m being downvoted. Comparing the speed of the British election cycle to that of the US is mismatched. Yes, US elections are ridiculous and bloated, but that’s still the reality of them. Regardless, we’ll have to do things faster based on circumstances.

                • Triasha@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  France put together a winning left coalition in 2 weeks.

                  How does the US being a bigger, wealthier, country mean we are weaker? I’m so tired of these arguments about what we can’t do. If Biden dropped out 2 weeks before November it would be a disaster. As it is, he is listening to the legitimate concerns of the people.

                • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well, the US is literally the second-most populous electoral democracy and the third-most populous country in the world, so I say we’ll need some time.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              How does AOC know what the elites want? Does she spend a lot of time having conversations with the elites about which direction they want politics to go?

              • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                She says she was in those conversations with high profile Democrats who have expressed more concerns about their donors rather than about their constituents.

          • theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            I voted for President Not Trump twice, I’m very much motivated to vote for President Not Trump a third time.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s going to be vote blue no matter who

            So the same thing that’s been said to get people to vote for Biden in the first place?

            If the Biden campaign was mostly running on “Not Trump,” anyone they replace him with will also not be Trump.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              A lot of people just felt like it was time to trade in their Not Trump for a newer model Not Trump. Sure there were other Not Trumps we could’ve gone with a year ago, but those Not Trumps are no longer on the market. So we’re going with the best available Not Trump right now.

              This Not Trump isn’t in mint condition (but none of them are), but it has much better mileage and it has more acceleration and a better top speed.

              As is the case with all Not Trumps this one is a better choice than Trump. Obviously.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, of course he’s going to endorse her. Still doesn’t mean that delegates don’t decide after an open convention. If she can show the delegates she has what it takes then she earns it.

          • dank@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Who cares if it’s Kamala? She’s not senile, she’s not Genocide Joe, and she’s not an unhinged fascist. She’s a shoe-in.

          • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            3 months ago

            Newsom is the only option with any chance of winning, but democrats aren’t even trying to win this election.

            • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              They’re clearly trying to win if they got so scared about polls they strong-armed Biden into resigning. The panic has pretty clearly set in. We’ll see if this works or not.

            • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I abhor Gavin Newsome and would only vote for him to replace Trump. There are almost zero things Gavin Newsome can do that any other candidate can do better. He’s a slimy, adulterous predator who is more concerned with being remembered than doing something memorable.

            • Triasha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think you realize how much of a stink “California Governor” has in middle America.

              It’s bullshit. We should all be so lucky to live in a place like California, but fox News Propaganda has been working for decades convincing disengaged voters that Cali is a hellscape.

              I think Newsom would make a fantastic President, but I am not convinced he has the best chance to win.

            • dank@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Just about anyone can beat Trump. Now that we don’t have a senile old man holding us back, we’ll be fine.

            • Omega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              3 months ago

              Harris or Manchin.

              Harris actually sounds pretty good when she’s talking politics. Her tough on crime past can give her a boost with moderates and centrists as well. She just has the weirdest mannerisms when trying to relate to people.

              Manchin has obvious appeal to centrists and moderates. His biggest issue is his opposition to climate change action. But other than that he’d be considered liberal by '90s standards.

              Newsom needs to go through the primary process to see if he can appeal to swing state voters. Because I’m not convinced he can win those margin votes that he needs.

                • Omega@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Manchin is a lot closer to a Democrat than a Republican. A LOT closer.

              • sudo@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                3 months ago

                Manchin is running as an independent Senator in 2024. Giving him the nom would be the biggest “fuck you” to their voters.

                Harris is the only logical choice. She’s not the best candidate but she can form coherent sentences and isnt surprising voters any more than Biden dropping.

      • braindefragger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I don’t see it that way at all. This seems like a great way to increase their votes. It’s not like they are going to lose voters who were going to vote Biden to begin with.

          • braindefragger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s never about those that were going to vote for Biden anyways. It’s always been about the undecided voters.

            Right. That’s obviously the whole point.

        • ECB@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah the reality is that Biden was 95% going to lose to Trump. Picking a new person is usially a huge risk, but in this case there wasn’t much to lose.

          As things stand right now, Trumps chances of winning just went down a bit. Worst case, they pick someone terrible with similar (non-)chances to Biden. Best case, they pick someone who wins.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’ve 100% thought through this. Harris takes over the Biden / Harris campaign war chest, and if Biden drops out now, the party can go into the align around Harris before the convention. And now we have 3+ months to get people hyped about not voting for an old white dude.

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’ve posted this 5 times in this thread in the last 20 minutes. Take a moment to read your own link…

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

          • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            From the article you linked to:

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Republicans are going to play every trick in the book, legal, moral, ethical or not. They will shout it at the rallies, take every opportunity to stir up shit on television (with help from Koch and Sinclair owned media) and you will hear every reason why the democratic nominee cannot be President. If Democrats find someone with a squeaky clean record and the Republicans can’t find anything truthful, they’ll fabricate it with ease. “Kamala Harris ate a moldy bagel in 2018 therefore she can’t be president.”

            The one advantage Democrats have at this very second, is that Republicans and Trump can’t use the media machine to pre-emptively smear any one person, since nobody knows who the nominee will be yet. Use this opportunity well and combat the “ahh confusion, somehow only Trump makes sense” narrative that will be sure to be floated.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              They’ll do all that no matter what. They already did that to Kamala Harris, in the last election. I’m sure they tried really hard to dig up shit on her but had to resort to making up shit.

              Basically all they fabricated was the same weak-ass birther bullshit they did to Obama (odd how it’s only non-white people they use that on, isn’t it?) which is now being spread again on Facebook as we speak.

              Intentionally mispronouncing her name, which they re-hashed in the RNC convention. Her name is literally consonent-vowel-consonent-vowel-consonent-vowel, not really hard to say so they just sound like morons when they do that.

              I guess they don’t like how she laughs?

              They lost that election. Their base likes the racist dog-whistles, but those are votes they have no matter what. Doing the same bullshit they did before loses them independents.

              Remember how a lot of Republicans voted for Nikki Haley even after she dropped out of the primary? It wasn’t a love for Nikki Haley, it was a dislike for Trump that motivated Republicans to vote for Nikki Haley in the primaries. After she dropped out. So there’s even Republicans that are open to voting for a woman with a South Asian background that the MAGAs like to intentionally mispronouncing her name.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            This only indicates the GOP does not want to be running against Kamala Harris.

            This is a good sign.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      That cuts both ways. The GOP also has to pivot from “Biden is too old!” to “Trump is NOT too old” in the few remaining months.

    • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol… From a foreigner this is hilarious. Some of you still want to support the guy that tried disrupt the governmental process… He called the frigging election investigator FFS. You can listen to him tell her how 'her job is the most important in The country rn… and talk at length about how fraud will be found.

      People that want trump want a king. Plain and simple.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Mike Johnson has literally already made it clear that in these circumstances he intends to CONTEST the new candidate being allowed on ballots.

      We live in the fucking stupidest ass timeline.

      The time for dropping Biden was before the fucking primaries and now we’re walking right the fuck into a Republican trap.

      Fuck me, someone just kill me now so Trump can’t institutionally fucking murder me.

      Source: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/johnson-replacing-biden-ticket-wrong-unlawful/story?id=112129063

      Democrats are fuckin morons who want to lose.

      • Jordan117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mike Johnson is (as usual) full of shit. The DNC is still a month away and not a single state ballot deadline has passed.

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is no candidate until the convention. Biden wasn’t actually the nominee yet, so there’s nothing for them to contest. Johnson put out that threat to scare you.

      • Kroxx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Biden isn’t even the nominee yet that’s one of the reasons it was important this happened before the DNC. Before the nomination this is no official presidential candidate, ol’ Mikey Poo-Bear is yaking out of his ass. Mike even said “some legal impediments in at least a few of these jurisdictions”, he’s just posturing for attention. No more threatening than a bantam rooster when you walk in his coup.

      • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        from the article

        Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    For all of y’all anxiety-pilled people: this is great news. Biden was stuck in negative momentum because his health issues had been exposed and were not going to stop resulting in terrible headlines, which is a problem whoever comes next is not going to have, unless the delegates are somehow stupid enough to pull another dinosaur from below the rug.

    More interestingly: now that Biden has pulled out because he’s patently too old, as it was a concern for plenty of voters, this is a golden opportunity to put the focus on the other candidate whose age is a somewhat less obvious but still noticeable issue.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh boy, I can’t wait for armchair pundits who were calling for Joe to step down to now turn around and start to nitpick Harris as if that wasn’t going to be the obvious successor.

    I’m 100% behind Harris or anyone who gets the Dem nom. Trump must be stopped.

    This is still a battle for America’s soul. Are we going to accept the first female president or the first convicted felon president? I sure hope the left turns out for this one, even if they aren’t super stoked about it, because we might never recover from another Trump disaster.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We can hope. If the media attention is “Democrats are in shambles 3 months before the election” it might not go so well. And Trump will definitely be making a lot of noise about that.

      • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I feel like the Democrats appeared more in shambles with him refusing to drop out. The party was all over the place on their support for him and he was just being a stubborn old man. Now they’ll hopefully all be able to come together and rally behind a single candidate.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hope the Dems will quickly rally behind a new candidate and show more of the bad side of rump in the political debate, not just Bidens age. I think this is a huge chance

  • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    This decision really raises my opinion of Biden so much. God damn do I love that man, he is truly a great person who dedicated his life to serve his country, literally. He honestly had a great term given the circumstances, and the only thing he probably should have done differently is to not run for reelection to begin with. But he seemed to genuinely believe he could win and stave off Trump. Now that that seemed impossible, he makes a very courageous decision that a lot of people probably wouldn’t have made and puts the country ahead of his ego. Lots of respect from me, and I hope this reinvigorates the democratic base and makes the future brighter for all of us.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Biden wasn’t doing what needed to be done to come back from the debate. This wasn’t a move out of desperation. It was out of necessity.

      I hope they have a plan too.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Make the democrats mistakes less existential by introducing competition into the electoral process with Ranked Choice voting.

      More political parties, more chances to beat trump, more people voting.

    • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Realistically… from a foreigner . They shouldn’t …really… Have to…

      Anybody that votes for trump wants a king. Plain and simple.

      Provided America has a functional education system, the Dems should easily be able to coast against someone that actively tried to retain power in the ways that he did. You can listen to the cals yaknow.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 months ago

    I respect the decision and it means he goes out on top. It must have been a difficult decision, but he was one of the better presidents (I see an historian pol ranking him 14th best) and I believe history will remember him even better. I wish Joe Biden all the best in retirement.

    Now comes the hard part. How do we avoid him having to say “I told you so”? How do we avoid repeating the disaster of the worst ranked President in history?