Hello! I’ve been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I’ve picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here’s the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the “free speech” alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What’s wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I’ll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that’s like kicking the hornet’s nest, so you don’t need to start in with “that’s a bad idea” I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is a distinct difference.

    Freedom of speach means that the government can’t punnish you for talking shit, except in limited circumstances.

    Freedom of consequences from what you say, means that no one should be allowed to let what your say affect them in any way, this means that no one would be allowed to be offended by what you might say, nor that they would be allowed to act on such offence.

    In a functional society you want to have freedom of speach, but not freedom of consequences from what you say. This allows you to express opposing views in mostly resonable ways.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      As long as the consequences are words and non-violent actions. Advocating violence as a consequence for someone expressing an idea is imho dangerous and should be avoided.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        yes, but words that incite violence are also very dangerous. there is a line to thread here.

        case in point: i don’t think goebbels actually directly harmed anyone, but his speech caused quite a lot of suffering, violence and death. his speech should absolutely not be rebutted with ‘just words’, there must be actual consequences to what he did.

        on top of it we live in a world where his propaganda techniques are still used for harm.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The limited restrictions in the US is that you can’t for example yell “Fire!” in a room to try and cause panic.

        Here in Sweden, we also have hate speech laws, which basically comes down to “You can’t incite violence toward an ethnic group”