• Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    7 months ago

    Psh, that’s some weak-ass quiet quitting. I perform below standard and just barely comply with whatever instructions they give to “correct” me.

    The point is to put them between tolerating you and dealing with the hassle of hiring someone new

    • Gorb [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think they’ve always been like this. Thet have nothing to occupy the work day than being paranoid and making everyones life worse

      • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        “ooooohhh nooooooo my wage slaves aren’t performing emotional labor to cater to my delicate ego constructed on false bourgeoisie class identity. I want these trained monkeys to SMILE when they dance, not just do exactly as I’ve asked based on contractual obligation.”

    • Mindfury [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      yes, because they know they are doing a bullshit job

      subordinates knowing the value of their labour is the trigger-point of the middle manager’s exstential crisis

  • “i know my enterprise critical, high functioning employees are unhappy with their present conditions and my anxiety grows as i realize the increasing likelihood they will leave because the conditions i impose on them are even worse than they might find elsewhere in the community. however, i am unwilling to do anything productive about this except blame them as personally responsible for my unease.” - confessions of the average typically self-deluded middle manager / small business tyrant

    anyway, my work involves doing critical analysis of systems. i was specifically sought out and hired by the organization for having “strong critical analysis skills”. let me tell you how much management hates when i apply those skills to the organization.

    like how several middle managers’ jobs, despite their JUMBO 4x-6x salaries, consist of sitting through meetings all day, saying the budgets are all in the red/there is no meat on the bone for anything, and additionally they have taken on so many commitments they cannot follow through on any one of them so they have delegated all of their responsibilities to their subordinates and cannot provide any updates on anything.

    as though that doesn’t suggest an immediate solution.

  • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Isn’t quiet quitting completing work to the minimum you can get away with?

    How is this quiet quitting, and if it is, what isn’t?

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not quiet quitting. This is a perfect example of words being so overused and applied so broadly that the meaning is lost.

      • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        7 months ago

        The only usage that would make any sense, and what I have always thought must have been the original meaning, is people who literally sit on their phone and send in job applications and do little to no work until the boss notices.

        This got turned into “doing only exactly what was asked” and now we’re finally at “Really great work but could do more!!!”

    • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think what they mean here is that the person does their assigned work and then goes home early instead of sitting around pretending to be busy.

      • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think it’s not asking for extra work, but the thing is if they did that their performance would likely drop. I genuinely don’t get how managers seem incapable of understanding that the quality of the work turned in is directly related to timelines and workload.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 months ago

    if your employees dont whistle while they work and say “aw shucks i wish i could stay at work all day!” after every shift they’re actually saboteurs

  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You keep saying I need goals you docked me pretty significantly on my review saying I am “my device too much”. Do i do my job? “Yes you do but…” but what? Leave me alone. Stick me on nights and afternoons only if you don’t want to see me doing nothing after my tasks are completed. Otherwise assign me tasks and I will do them. Goals? You mean pointless extra work that turns into yet another organization wide box for everyone to check? Please.

  • Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pure liberal vibes-based idealism in action. They reflexively oppose workers, so any time a worker doesn’t want to die it’s suspicious.

  • IceWallowCum [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s amazing how the slimyness moving just behind the text seems confusing and hard to grasp until you’ve read Marx, then you just see the nature of the exploitation everyfuckingwhere