The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?
Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.
The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?
Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.
Mind explaing how that matters here? An ELI5 ?
deleted by creator
So your argument is that we are exposing people to some different vaccines this year and that could be causing the anamoly in side effects database of 2021?
deleted by creator
What else is needed to reach those conclusions? Keep in mind, that much less has been required to publish reports of efficacy of vaccines, for most of the already published articles.
deleted by creator
The source is a government source and like a typical government source, it strives to maintain main government line throigh those disclsimers.
Also, number of doses administered is quite public data and coupling that with VAERS data isn’t particularly complicated. If you think it gives a picture favourable to vaccines, maybe find some academic work that proves that? If you can’t find such work in public domain, maybe try doing it yourself?
deleted by creator
I am not implying there is an anomaly. There is an anomaly, I am asking for explanation.
As I said, this data is available easily.
How is this low? Typical safe vaccines have less than 10 adverse events per million doses administered, over long term observation.
Scroll down the link. This is written on this page: However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths pdf icon[1.4 MB, 33 pages].
I am not sure why you are wasting space with these questions. To humour you, I need a clarification from your side:
Which one is it?
EDIT : typos, grammar fixes
We’re not vaccine experts, like I couldn’t ELI5 how different medication differs…
Since when have statistical observations required medical expertise?
That totally depends on the issue.
Are you one of those who believes that science is subjective, like politics?
No.
Then comment on the statistics objectively, rather than taking one side on the issue.