A few days ago I shared some news that the Eurovision song from Israel would be named “Your land is mine now” to later realize it was from an onion kind of website, lol.

I hope I’m not alone in this kind of f’up.

  • Count042
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Do your own research. That was literally the point of the court hearing.

    It’s why they ordered Israel to preserve evidence.

    Seriously, watch all three presentations. It’s worth doing. Unless you don’t want your obvious world view destroyed.

    If you don’t want to be `bullied’ (although, I can’t for the life of me understand why you’d use that word for people defending themselves from your accusations of antisemitism due to them pointing out a genocide), then don’t attack people with the bad faith accusation of antisemitism.

    You still haven’t answered the question.

    Come on, I answered yours. It’s your turn.

    What would it take for you to admit that recognizing a genocide isn’t antisemitism?

    • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If the ICJ stated genocide is likely happening, those quotes exist and would be used by you to bolster their case.

      I think.you are essentially just makinf your argument on the vibe of your reading of the international.courts, and not what is documented. Am i correct?

      • Count042
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I got bored: https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations

        That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

        You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

        And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

      • Count042
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think you are refusing to do any research on something you aren’t willing to change your mind about. I think nothing would change your mind, so you didn’t even bother watching any of the three parts of the hearing because you already knew what you would believe.

        Your method of doing that is to never state a clear opinion, not engage in any logic, and respond to everything with questions.

        I’ll follow suit. What do you think the purpose of that hearing was, and what do you think the conclusion was for the hearing?

        But, as per my previous paragraph, I’d bet you didn’t even watch it.

        • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m sorry you don’t like the fact that I’m asking you questions regarding your claims instead of just arguing at you or outright accepting them without question. I imagine I can be frustrating when you are wanting one of those two options and I won’t provide it.

          But you are bringing forth accusations, millenia old accusations, and they should be examined.

          As for what I think the conclusion of the hearings was, we have not concluded the proceedings whatsoever and anybody claiming determinations have been released is being dishonest.

          I’m giving you every opportunity to discuss this without hyperbolism.

          • Count042
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I got bored. https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

            You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

            And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

            We do know the conclusion to the prelimenary hearing to determine if Israel is plausibly committing genocide, which is what has happened so far. Pretending that that hasn’t happened is just bad faith arguing from a bigot.

            Have fun justifying people starving to death with bellies full of grass caused by a government found by the ICJ to plausibly be committing genocide.

            But you are bringing forth accusations, millenia old accusations, and they should be examined.

            They have been. You’re ignoring anything that gives an answer you don’t like, and accusing the people who have paid attention of being antisemites, cheapening the word for actual antisemitism.

          • Count042
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Last week the first children (cause children always die first from starvation) died from starvation.

            Say it with me: Israel is committing genocide you bigoted fuck.