• AgreeableLandscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 years ago

    Loss of what? I don’t see how port scanning the user’s devices factors into that.

    • muirrum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 years ago

      That was my thought line too. There’s no real need that I can see for this sort of thing.

      • AgreeableLandscape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 years ago

        IMO, system-level features like port scanning should at least require a browser-generated permissions prompt like sensible browsers have for camera and microphone access, if not non-existent from the APIs available to websites.

        • muirrum
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 years ago

          I can’t think of a use-case where a third-party website would ever need to see what ports I have open on my machine.

          • AgreeableLandscape
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 years ago

            Exactly. Same with what extensions I have installed and most other information listed in the fingerprinting section of Panopticlick.

            It’s for browser/device fingerprinting and basically nothing else.