Seems like many companies product quality has plummeted over the last few years. For example, Google (despite its flaws), used to have good products and services. Now they are virtually unusable.

My doctor sent me forms to my Gmail and I never got them. I looked it up and apparently Gmail has the document provider blocked so you literally cannot get medical forms. Stuff like this happens all the time now! Their search engine is nothing but sponsored ads now.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. I just think it’s funny that capitalism ends up making much much worse products over time.

    • @bleepingblorp@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      What!? The iPhone with the longer screen and rearranged camera lenses isn’t a feat of engineering compared to the iPhone with the slightly smaller screen?! But the shiny commercials said it was!

      • @i_must_destroy@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        I’m so sick of Apple’s constant bugs that I contemplated going to Android. I briefly got on my moms Android phone and it was full of junk! Love how there is just a choice between two bad products and you can’t even use a Huwai phone in the US.

          • Arsen6331 ☭
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Or you can use a PinePhone Pro and run an OS that’s actually good, with more customizability than Android can dream of.

              • Arsen6331 ☭
                link
                fedilink
                52 years ago

                Even if that were true

                It is. Mainline GNU/Linux is far better than Android. It is faster, has more features, provides much more freedom, is more open, has more customizability, etc.

                I don’t think linux phones have much convenience.

                You’re right about that, but they’re getting better. The PinePhone Pro is finally getting hardware accelerated android apps via Waydroid, so pretty soon, you’ll be able to get the best of both worlds. Also, the cameras are working now.

                • Muad'Dibber
                  link
                  fedilink
                  62 years ago

                  I totally get it, but I still think android is the future OS (and it already is the most used OS on the planet).

                  Google’s decision to keep the majority of android open source (AOSP) was a business decision, because it valued international growth and spread, and they knowingly allowed int’l carriers to add what they want (whereas apple told them to take it or leave it, and iOS is staying closed source). If the goal though was to eventually pull a microsoft and force you to use their proprietary addons software, that ship has long since sailed, since there are too many variants and people to keep happy all over the world now. I genuinely do think that google as a company is smarter than the US government, they’re an international company and care more about not alienating int’l carriers than they do pleasing the US gov.

                  Don’t get me wrong, I 100% think google is spying, and collaborating with the US government, but they’re doing through google services and gmail, not through AOSP and all the android variants.

                  Even the chinese made variants like MIUI and Huawei’s harmonyOS are just android variants based on AOSP.

                  If google tries some fuckery, or tries to close source AOSP, which is entirely possible, then a coalition of Chinese, Indian, and possibly European countries would pick up where google left off and fork AOSP and create their own standard.

                  • Arsen6331 ☭
                    link
                    fedilink
                    6
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    There are more problems with Android than just spying. One of the main ones being the fact that it is based on Java. Java runs on the JVM, which adds a lot of overhead. This means that older hardware will always struggle to run it, especially as newer apps appear, whereas Linux can run easily on anything from a 2.5cm by 2.5cm square with a CPU on it to a supercomputer.

                    Also, all OSes have to use different application code due to differences in the OS internals. Because of this, modern apps are absolutely massive because they bundle everything they need to run, so they get to insane sizes. These differences exist because the different OSes are optimized for the device they run on. Windows/macOS on computers, Android/iOS on mobile, etc., whereas Linux has the ability to adapt to whatever device it runs on, and swap out entire components of the OS to accommodate the hardware and form factor of said device easily (as in with just a few simple commands).

                    I think that ultimately, if Android wasn’t already so commonly-used, mainline Linux would be a better option. The only reason Linux devices can’t compete currently with other options is that no one puts time into writing code for them except for hobbyists like me who have the motivation to do so because it’s interesting and we want to contribute to the community. If more time was invested into it, it could go way beyond what current OSes offer.

      • MexicanCCPBot
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Never mind Apple implementing features 2 years after every other major manufacturer already did, and also a bit worse. Bruh why do Americans like those shits, is it really just status?

        • Muad'Dibber
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          It very much is status. Every time I visit bourgeois liberal cities, its iphones and teslas everywhere. They sell identities to rich liberals who have none of their own.

        • @carpe_modo@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Most of the people I know with are just still with them because at this point, they’re around the same price as other phones, and they’re used to how iPhones work. There used to be a huge brand loyalty thing. It was weird. It got enough people used to them that they just don’t wanna relearn another system.

          • MexicanCCPBot
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            they’re around the same price as other phones

            Oh that’s true, Xiaomi is banned in the US or something

            • @carpe_modo@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              72 years ago

              Huawei is banned. Xiaomi won’t sell here because the only way to get any market share is through the carriers, and they don’t want to partner with the carriers. Understandable. Most people here don’t want to partner with the carriers, either.

              • MexicanCCPBot
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                That’s strange, Mexican carriers have carried them for a few years now (at a slightly inflated price, though)

                • @carpe_modo@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 years ago

                  That slightly might be the issue. Carriers here wouldn’t allow a phone significantly cheaper than the ones already here.

            • Muad'Dibber
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              I’m in the US and have a Xiaomi, but you’re right, the carriers here don’t carry them, you have to order them from China or an ebay reseller and hope your carrier lets you bring on the phone. Still worth it, its a more reliable samsung that costs hundreds less.

              • @zigzagadhesive
                link
                22 years ago

                Is there any research you did to give you certainty that the phone model you chose would work on your carrier? Assuming technical compatibility, is a CN phone guaranteed to work on your network? Or are u.s. carriers playing games like banning MACs (or equivalent) of certain manufacturer’s devices?

                Thanks!