The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?

Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
    21·
    3 years ago

    They obviously are a bad faith actor, so many replies and they weren’t even willing to make a proper claim.

      • मुक्तOP
        12·
        3 years ago

        So you are here not to discuss the data but to do your prejudiced advocacy of vaccines, regardless of what your actual findings are. How are your own actions, not in bad faith?

          • मुक्तOP
            11·
            3 years ago

            Your claim that there is no anomaly amounts to claiming that the data of 2021 is in line with other data in the chart. Even a 13 year old can see that that is not the case just by looking at the chart.

            I even posted dictionary definition of the word anomaly, but it seems many have lost the ability to understand from that and somehow faith becomes the central issue.

            Is medical science a religion now?

              • मुक्तOP
                12·
                3 years ago

                Is that all you need me to chant or some chants of “praise the lord” will also be needed after this?

    • मुक्तOP
      12·
      3 years ago

      The claim is simple enough : there is a chart summarizing some data where one value doesn’t fit the pattern. An anomaly. The reason for its existence is sought.

      I agree with you that the issue is with faith. A rational mind wouldn’t jump so many hoops to deny the existence of anomaly as some of the folks here.

      EDIT : slight altering of sentences for clarity; fixed typos.

        • मुक्तOP
          1·
          3 years ago

          I’d like to see just one “rebuttal” that makes sense or even rationally holds together.

          I am yet to prove anything either way, and this must have been clear to anyone interacting in good faith. I could even refer you to dictionary definition of proof, but your capacity to benefit from that exercise is questionable.

            • मुक्तOP
              13·
              3 years ago

              You keep on saying “flawed data.” “Flawed data.” Like it will magically make things good.

              VAERS data has been used to detect unsafe vaccines since ages. No new factor lowering quality of data has been reported for current vaccines. There is no inherent reason to believe that VAERS data is not pointing in the right direction, except the fact that official line is to be reluctant to criticize any COVID vaccine for any reason.

              If you can’t find good arguments, just say so.

              • sexy_peach@feddit.de
                11·
                3 years ago

                VAERS data has been used to detect unsafe vaccines since ages.

                That has nothing to do with wether there is a problem in this case or not.

                • मुक्तOP
                  12·
                  3 years ago
                  1. No new problem with data is reported.
                  2. The low quality of data was always there, but it was statistically insignificant for the kind of percentages we are discussing.