The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?

Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.

  • मुक्तOP
    12·
    3 years ago

    The claim is simple enough : there is a chart summarizing some data where one value doesn’t fit the pattern. An anomaly. The reason for its existence is sought.

    I agree with you that the issue is with faith. A rational mind wouldn’t jump so many hoops to deny the existence of anomaly as some of the folks here.

    EDIT : slight altering of sentences for clarity; fixed typos.

      • मुक्तOP
        1·
        3 years ago

        I’d like to see just one “rebuttal” that makes sense or even rationally holds together.

        I am yet to prove anything either way, and this must have been clear to anyone interacting in good faith. I could even refer you to dictionary definition of proof, but your capacity to benefit from that exercise is questionable.

          • मुक्तOP
            13·
            3 years ago

            You keep on saying “flawed data.” “Flawed data.” Like it will magically make things good.

            VAERS data has been used to detect unsafe vaccines since ages. No new factor lowering quality of data has been reported for current vaccines. There is no inherent reason to believe that VAERS data is not pointing in the right direction, except the fact that official line is to be reluctant to criticize any COVID vaccine for any reason.

            If you can’t find good arguments, just say so.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.de
              11·
              3 years ago

              VAERS data has been used to detect unsafe vaccines since ages.

              That has nothing to do with wether there is a problem in this case or not.

              • मुक्तOP
                12·
                3 years ago
                1. No new problem with data is reported.
                2. The low quality of data was always there, but it was statistically insignificant for the kind of percentages we are discussing.