• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Dutch and British just took home the natives of their colonies as immigrants who opened restaurants. Why try to emulate when you can get the real deal?

    • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      100%

      If I hear that an Indian restaurant locally has been busted by immigration, I immediately head round.

      Also, the reason most British food is bland is because of rationing during WW2. People who grew up back then ate food which was made with limited resources and that was the food they felt nostalgic for and made for their children, who then went on to make it for their own children.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          France is (mostly) not an island and they weren’t besieged during WWII.

          I’ve also heard that Britain rolling early with the Industrial Revolution meant that they got the big cities quicker and fed them with bland canned goods before they worked out the fresh goods logistics.

          • Spendrill@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            and they weren’t besieged during WWII.

            Cheese eating surrender monkeys. Created a state of the art defence system but didn’t extend it across the gap where ‘the Germans will never invade through such rough terrain’ although they did before during WWI.

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The British do too. Like we have to top five healthiest teeth in the world.

          Americans need to stop confusing their memes foe actual knowledge and experience of the world.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        rationing during WW2

        Not just during but long after (well into the 1950s). People generally don’t understand that Britain literally bankrupted herself holding out against Germany, then got to watch as the former Axis powers rebounded faster than they did.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Less we bankrupted ourselves and more the Americans bankrupted us. America put a lot of effort in the early 20th century to undermining the influence of the BE and was far more concerned with building up west Germany as a barrier to the Soviets than they did with building back up allies like the UK and France.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The same reason you have all of human knowledge at your finger tips, yet only use the same tired joke over and over.

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fucks me up as a German, too. Globalization gave us all kinds of tasty spices, but go to any public event and you’d be convinced our greatest culinary achievement is sausage with tomato ketchup and curry powder.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also wenn du mich so fragst, hätte ich gerne so Döner-style Fladenbrot mit Kümmel, Schwarzkümmel und Senfkörnern im Teig. Das dann von innen bestrichen mit etwas Erdnussmus. Dann das übliche Döner-Grünzeug rein, aber kurz scharf in einem Wok angebraten und in Soja-Sauce getaucht. Darüber frisch gemalener bunter Pfeffer und ein guter Esslöffel kaltgepresstes Rapsöl. Und dann Champignons geschnetzelt + ordentlich angebraten und mit Gyros-Gewürzen mariniert noch darin einbetten.

        Ich denke, das sollte man gut in so einem Imbisswagen zubereiten können. 🙃

        Also habe jetzt natürlich übertrieben. Keine Ahnung, ob das noch gut ist. Aber habe tatsächlich schonmal so Champignon-Geschnetzeltes in einem Fladenbrot gemacht und das war extrem geil. Seither hätte ich tatsächlich gerne mal einen vollwertigen Döner damit…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As an American, going to any German-themed public event (read: Oktoberfest and uhh… that’s about it) convinces me that your greatest culinary achievement is sausage with mustard and sauerkraut. Not too shabby, TBH.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know, if it’s more popular in other regions of Germany, but I’ve only had plain sauerkraut once in my life. 🙃

        Only real dish involving sauerkraut around here is Krautschupfnudeln:

        And well, by roasting the sauerkraut, it caramelizes a little bit and some of the vinegar dissipates, so it doesn’t actually taste as sauer anymore.

        • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          we also had schupfnudeln with sauerkraut, but with chopped bacon added.

          asside from that, i also know mashed potatos with kassler (cured pork),
          Leberwurst(loose sausage that is usualy used as a spread)
          and blutwurst(blood sausage)
          boiled in sauerkraut, as a Christmas classic.

          (both sausages were loose and squeezed out of the casing)

          i also remember grandpa snacking on cold raw plain sauerkraut for dinner.
          but he was the only person i know that ate it like that.

          but i dont remember any other dishes ive eaten with sauerkraut in it.

          • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            no, i do that too, but grandpa is where i picked the habit up from. it’s crunchy tasty homemade sauerkraut though, not that store-bought shit.

    • i mean the good stuff is not typically served at these events. I’m thinking roulade and gulash that need to simmer for multiple hours.

      Also in central Europe it is difficult to consider foods distinct to one country. Most of Polish, Czech and German cuisine overlap a lot.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, yeah, to some degree these are just very easy to prepare. To some degree, they’re just the lowest common denominator, though, which is what I’m mainly annoyed by. Lots of these simpler foods could be easily improved by adding some spices, or we could even adopt some of the many street foods in Eastern Asia, to bring in more variety…

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      British invention anyway. Curry powder from the British occupying forces in Berlin.

      Gern gesehen.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But “Currywurst” (curry sausage) was invented in Berlin. Indian wouldn’t use curry powder without vegetables in this way, or currypower at all (correct me if I’m wrong)

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m no expert either, but yeah, I believe the lazy method of making the curry dish (Indian, Thai etc.) is to use curry paste. Our curry powder barely resembles the taste of the curry dish. In particular, it’s lacking tons of chili. 🫠

          • lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was once explained that curry in the Indian sense is a rice vegetable dish with a lot of spices. To make it easier for the Brits, the powder was developed so that you don’t need all the fresh spices.

            • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Curry in India is usually a side-dish served with rice or chapathi (flatbread). It contains a lot of vegetables, various herbs and spices, and optionally fish or meat. But the rice itself is not a part of the curry. Also we do use curry powder, mainly when we don’t have time or space to mix the spices properly.

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you read the entire sentence “the British occupying forces in Berlin”

          British. In Berlin.

          Who do you think had lots of curry powder?

          • lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Curry powder is a British invention, Currywurst is German, only possible with the British but still a German invention

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The best restaurants in the world are in London. Of course they don’t serve English food. The Brits just knew to bring the best stuff home.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. This is a subjective, but would be pretty universally laughed at in the culinary world especially when compared to France, Italy, Tokyo, or any American city.

      2. restaurants weren’t even prevalent until the early 1900s, way past the introduction of spices.

      Outside of London the UK has a very low presence of Michelin rated restaurants compared to Europe, the US, and Japan. Not the best metric, but there’s no reason why Britain’s restaurants, who would stand to benefit from such rating, is being unfairly treated.

      Btw I actually like British food, and have spent a lot of time in the UK. Just think your comment is funny, and the upvotes are funnier.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        any American city

        You just tried to slip that in there, hoping we wouldn’t notice

      • NotSpez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get your point number one, but any American city better restaurants than London? You cannot seriously believe that. Sure, NY, Chicago, etc but common.

        • GR4VY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They probably mean any large/prominent American city comparable in size to London.

          • foo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are still wrong. London is up with the best you will find anywhere in the world. Even a lot of large US cities are a poorer substitute.

            • GR4VY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can’t make an argument for or against that, because I’ve never been to London. I was just saying what I thought they meant 😊

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s very, very subjective mate,

        or any American city

        is incredibly wrong from the culinary world’s point of view, I can assure you

        I think DC and LA are about the only two cities in the top 20 worldwide if we’re talking culinary excellence

    • kirk782@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That weirdly applies to museums as well. The best museums in the world are in London. Of course, they don’t serve English stuff. The Brits just knew to bring the best stuff home.

      Also, what do you call English food in other countries? Prison food.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Legitimately, though: I listened to my sister tell her 4-year about “yummy spices” at Thanksgiving. The example she used was “like salt!” I was horrified.

    She also made & brought the absolute worst green bean casserole I have ever tasted in my life. It was like wet, crunchy green beans covered in French-fried onions (which came from a can, which is why it’s pretty much the only thing she got right).

    She used “no added salt/sodium” cream-of-mushroom soup, the green beans, and the canned fried onions, and added nothing else.

    I love green bean casserole, as it’s one of my favorite Thanksgiving foods. Even offered to make it for everyone this year! But she insisted that she wanted to do it.

    The only thing that was salty this Thanksgiving was me.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently discovered #16 black pepper. It truly can make things spicey. But table ground? Ha!

      I know someone allergic to capsaicin. I’ve seen him eat the mildest salsa and turn red. He also sweats to black pepper. Maybe your father has a similar allergy.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What is “#16 black pepper?” Isn’t that just a grind size?

        I didn’t know people used preground at home. Not any cheaper and tastes like actual dust. With a regular old pepper mill you can change that grind size easily. And no matter the grind size it doesn’t have the ability to make food “spicy” as in “hot.”

        • grayman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I grind my own pepper too, but #16 aka coarse ground is much larger pieces of ground pepper. #16 is the die size. You technically could grind it coarse yourself, but you’d have to sift it and only keep the bigger pieces. Here’s an example: Amazon Brand - Happy Belly Black Pepper, Coarse Ground, 18 Oz https://a.co/d/8e7AWHT But you should be able to find it at any big grocery store. I get it at Costco. It’s great for rubs and spicing up stuff just a bit. I think it’s the oil that remains in the course pieces as opposed to the smaller grind that allows the oil tooxidize quickly, which mutes the heat in the oil. I learned about it when I got into smoking meat. It’s used to crust a smoked brisket.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m British. Don’t put the Dutch in the same group as us. Our local ‘cuisine’ truly is a crime to food.

    • Treczoks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it isn’t. I have dined exceptionally well in the UK. Our Christmas dinner is based on an a recipe from an English cook. We have a Scottish cafe/diner in town which serves excellent food.

      OK, I’ve dined horribly, too, but it is definitely not the norm - I made the mistake of ordering half a chicken in a fish and chips shop. My recommendation: Don’t repeat my mistake.

    • Aganim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m Dutch, feel free to put us in the same group. They way we drown our potatoes in gravy absolutely is a crime against food.

    • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it isn’t though. You have shitty fast food like the rest of the world, but we also have Michelin star restaurants too. This is just yet another excuse for people to be xenophobic to the British.

      • Globulart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And there are loads of excuses already. No need to manufacture an extra one! I wonder how many Michelin star restaurants in the UK claim to serve traditional British food though.

        But genuinely, does the rest of the world dislike fish and chips, roast dinners, fried breakfasts, and pies? I know the stereotype has been around forever but I always had trouble believing that most non British people wouldn’t really like those foods.

        • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My understanding is a lot of them. The majority of restaurants in the Michelin guide certaintly are British cuisine. The stars, I’m not so sure. I would say there isn’t really any reason to be xenophobic or racist to anyone.

          • Globulart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah of course mate, it was a joke about how (historically) we’ve given people plenty of excuses to be.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And let’s be real, the Brits gave up their own food in favor of Indian food. They love that Tikka masala.

        • HiddenLayer5
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If we’re to insist on it being a specific country’s food, it really should be Indian no? It was invented by Indian diaspora in the UK as (IIRC) a take on traditional Indian food using ingredients that are easier to obtain in the UK.

          IMO saying tikka masala is British food is like saying General Tso’s Chicken, which was invented by Chinese diaspora in the US for similar reasons, is somehow American food. I don’t think the country it was invented in can really claim credit in either case.

          • scubbo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tikka Masala is an Indian-Inspired dish which was invented in the UK by people with Indian cultural heritage. That’s about as concise a description as you can get without running into difficulties of definition - there’s no consistent way of defining what “being a dish” means without running into contradictions.

            In fact General Tso’s is the perfect counter-example: Multiple Chinese people have told me they enthusiastically disown General Tso’s Chicken and explicitly call it American food. So if we say “a dish belongs to a country if it’s invented there”, then Tikka Masala is British (which I agree “feels” wrong); but if we say “a dish belongs to a country if it was inspired by the cuisine of that country”, then General Tso’s is Chinese, which, apparently not!

            And that’s without even considering the question of how far “back” you should go with inspiration - what if a dish was inspired by how the Indians used food they got from the Persians who traded it with the Chinese - is it Indian food or Chinese food? (Idk if that’s historically nonsense, but you get my point) Why is the most-recent ancestor more important than the environment of creation?

          • Enekk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I respectfully disagree with one major caveat. I’ll get that out of the way first; I think there should be a name for these foods that recognize the creators (e.g. Italian American food is American food that comes from Italian immigrants). We’ve traditionally been bad at giving credit or, worse, using names to mark a cuisine as “other” and weird.

            The thing is that there really isn’t a food of a place. People use ingredients that are available and use techniques from the people around them. When cultures interact, they create remixes of cuisine that take unfamiliar ingredients and techniques and create something new.

            Let me use the food of my own home, New Mexico, as an example. The food of the region is a mixture of Spanish colonizers, later Mexican immigrants, and Native American foods using a crazy combination of techniques and ingredients from all three. It isn’t Spanish food. It isn’t Mexican food. It isn’t Native American food. It is New Mexican food, a thing that arose from a place and its history. Now, with Asian immigrants moving in, the food has started to incorporate stuff from those cultures too.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The English have tikka masala, the Dutch have satay chicken.

  • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, it was for spices, definitely not for money.

    It was a different time. We don’t do that anymore!

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like, we bought and sold spice… For money.

      People obviously wanted spice and paid for it.

      That’s how trade and industry work. We didn’t just bring back exotic rocks.

    • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t get high off your own supply… Still true, we import and export more as we consume.

      • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t Marx the one that never worked nor had any money his entire life? Yup!

      • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s good to read Marx books, but history books are better. That way you can see examples of how socialism always fails due to human corruption.