• Palaress@lemmy.161.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    He gives the example of a fed wanting to find a suspects for a hacking case. He has a potential list of names, and subpoenas the phone company’s for their phone numbers. He then installs signal, whatsapp, telegram ( all of those services that use real person identifiers ) and adds those phone numbers to his contact list. Boom, now he can narrow down suspects because all of those services, including signal, will tell you if that person uses signal.

    The only thing the fed is doing here is checking if number x has signal installed. How is ‘having signal installed’ connected to ‘being a hacker/criminal’?

    • DessalinesOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Hackers are more likely to use encrypted messengers, and signal will gladly tell the world, even people you don’t know that you use it via contact lists. Anyone in law enforcement is going to consider someone who uses encrypted messengers a more likely suspect than someone who doesn’t.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator