If it blocks your IP, wouldn’t everyone who came to your house get banned as long as they’re using your Wi-Fi?

  • Rocky60@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if somebody at, let’s say, a Starbucks gets banned, would every costumer be at risk?

    • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit should be able to tell by the number of different accounts that connect through an IP like that that it’s not a home wifi network and treat it accordingly, the question is do they actually do that (probably cuz otherwise you’d never be able to connect through a VPN lol)

        • elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Either they’ll see it like some kind of public WiFi, or there’ll be collateral damage. But keep in mind that CG-NAT usually only applies to IPv4, so if your ISP and home network support IPv6, Reddit won’t have said problem and see you IPv6 address.

    • Genrawir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that account only ever logged in there, maybe? I’d think they’d be smart enough to look at the most commonly used IP address by the account(s) in question. Then again, it is reddit.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They most likely don’t rely on a single metric to determine if someone is evading a ban. False-positives can happen though.

    • SatanicNotMessianic
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t say how they do it now, but it used to happen all of the time. A service would ban an IP that was shared, or even a range of IPs if the traffic was disruptive enough. Then the owner would have to contact the service to have their ban removed.

      I’ve run into IP ban messages from both hotel WiFi and from VPN addresses.