I haven’t read a lot of these sources myself yet, but the first one at least by the Communist Party of India is worth a read.

  • ksynwa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 years ago

    That argument is based on the premise of false equivocation of Nazi Germany and China, a narrative in which equating deradicalisation camps with concentration camps plays a large part. China is not an expansionist state. They claim Tibet, Taiwan, which is a separate discussion but they have no intentions of expanding beyond that. They haven’t been in any war in the last fifty years. Similar argument could be used to justify Americans fighting in the Vietnam war which I am sure you know was not a justified invasion.

    • Whom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Oh no, in that example I’m equating China now and the US in that era. Meaning a force that opposes the greater evil (Germany then, the US now) but that itself has imperial interests. (In this case maybe not literal territorial expansion, but exerting control through business…much like the US but, yknow, not as aggressive)