• SatanicNotMessianic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let me offer a counterexample. I was in NYC on 9/11. I saw the first tower burning and I saw the second plane hit. I watched incredulously when they fell.

    The entire city froze. It was the first and only time NYC went silent. No cars, no construction, no one yelling. There has to have been at least 5000 people packed into a large crowd outside of Penn station, but no one was shoving or yelling for them to open the doors.

    NY actually stated like that for a while. It was surreal - it felt like a dream. But the city really did come together. People were more kind and helpful to strangers. They were more aware of their neighbors and their needs. People were handing out food and blankets on the streets, trying to get through the massive disruption. I saw no rioting, no crime surge despite the fact that emergency services were completely tied up.

    • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. People react differently to acute vs. chronic stress. I’ve seen it time and again. People are happy to help if it’s short-term. Then they get the feel-goods. But if there’s nothing in it for them, if they feel inconvenienced by ongoing suffering, charity dries up like tears in the Sahara. Very few are willing to be kind even when they don’t get to feel like a hero doing it.