• cloud@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    You may want to read the biography of Marx and the historical events of the 19th century. Wikipedia offers a good recap and data for further reading.

    • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could read actual works by Marx but it would require being able to read pages longer than a Wikipedia article.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Franz Mehring wrote thick biography of Marx, he was direct witness of many events and knew even more participants. I must read it someday when i will have some time.

      • cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your assumption that the person you are talking to isn’t familiar with it gives away that you are full of bullshit. Pick up a bunch of history books irl and read them from start to finish. Stop learning from memes and reddit posts.

        • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The person I’m talking to links Wikipedia articles and tells me to read ‘history books’ lmao. Of course I’m not taking it seriously.

          • cloud@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            And who do you take seriously? People telling you exactly what you want to hear?

            You seem familiar with Marx so cross check yourself the data with Wikipedia

            • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah yes, cuz Wikipedia is the holy grail of information. No, don’t read stuff by yourself, don’t pick up a book, just use wikipedia.


              fucking liberals

              Damn, you’re proving why we have this emoji

        • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok. I mean, I’m not going to do it IRL, since I have them on my tablet, but I’ll go read Blackshirts and Reds, Triumph of Evil, the Book of the Hopi, The Cold War and Its Origins, The Hidden History of the Korean War. I’ll also recommend you read them.

          Edit: How could I forget Killing Hope?!

          • cloud@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Read them all and draw your own conclusions on whether Stalin was a brutal dictator or someone to worship. I suggest you to read on paper or eink display to not strain your eyes.

              • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                WAIT wait wait wait wait, hold on, okay…so…uhhhh…okay, so, when you say

                Stalin was neither a brutal dictator nor someone to worship.

                what you’re REALLY saying is

                Stalin was a brutal dictator and someone to worship.

                is this right??? pls tell me

            • comrade-bear@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              https://dessalines.github.io/essays/socialism_faq.html#did-the-soviet-union-repress-and-kill-millions-of-people Again, why don’t you address nothing that’s been presented here, if you are so sure on your points, you can certainly present a competent argument about why those sources are not to be believed or why the other sources are better, let’s debate history, sources, methodology instead of just calling people dictators and posting wikipedia links, again make an argument for the sources that constitute the wikipedia articles you are mentioning, let’s move the discussion forward, I’m not against the debate, but let’s have one, you are asking everyone to read stuff, but what about you read some of our stuff as well, and let’s have a civil discussion about stuff.