With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?

Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

  • w2qw@aussie.zone
    1·
    1 年前

    No one is actually burying trees. What happens is that after the contract ends they can just cut down the trees, release the carbon and start again.

    I do agree with better regulation but forrestry ones should just go.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      1 年前

      Oh I just remembered, someone who worked at an arboretum who I met a while ago mentioned that trees actually diffuse carbon dioxide directly into the soil. I think he said it was about one third of the weight of the tree? That amount would still be sequestered even if the tree wasn’t buried. But I don’t know how stable that is over the long term.

      For offsets to work, they’d need to be based on the actual science of how much carbon they trap over what period of time. Different methods would need to have offset values published by the government. But I agree, offsets with algie or similar look much more feasible than trees.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      1·
      1 年前

      Not that this happens in real life, but a solution could be a law declaring those lands national reserves and not allowing for extraction anymore.