• waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree that the idea is great but I have yet to find one single address that I need to get to using the osmand app, which kind of makes it useless. It seems incredibly difficult to use.

    • projectmoon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s because OsmAnd has some serious issues searching for certain addresses. It’s not an OpenStreetMaps problem, but an issue with the app. Organic Maps is better. Magic Earth is even better. Note: only talking about address searching. OsmAnd still has a ton of other useful features.

      If I need to use OsmAnd, sometimes I’ll copy the plus code from Google Maps, as that translates to GPS coordinates.

      • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure it could be the app not going to deny that. It does feel like the app has so much to offer but it’s difficult to use. I have heard Magic Earth is good but since this is the privacy community I didn’t mention it or compare it to osm since it’s not FOSS.

        Copying codes from one source into osmand still breaks your privacy though because your using Google so might as well continue using Google. I’m not super paranoid or anything but for privacy sake I’d say unless I can contain my use case to the app (and osm) it doesn’t work out.

        I hope the entire movement grows 😁

      • MazonnaCara89
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can see the addresses in Osmand but can’t search them in the app IMG_20230811_081630_550

  • nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is there a way to make it pull some data on road closures from google maps? There’s a lot of construction on my way to work right now so I rely on google maps to pick the fastest routes, which it does well. OSM just doesn’t have the data to do that.

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, OsmAnd is pretty bad. Data presentation makes it feel like something out of 1960-s.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sounds like you just dont know how to use a map. Google maps is horrible to anyone who wants to actually use it like a map.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      As somebody who also uses paper maps for hiking still: I find google maps got a lot worse over the years, and is pretty much unusable for just looking at maps, while osmand provides easily readable maps.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It is clunky and takes tinkering to get it just right for each use case, which can be a pain especially for new users. But once it’s set up it works very well and most importantly works everywhere. While traveling abroad without cell data OsmAnd saved our asses more than once when Google Maps failed!

      It’s like Call of Duty vs Arma. Call of Duty is slick and is very good at a very specific experience. Arma isn’t nearly as smooth or pretty, and it has a learning curve but once you get past that it can do a wide variety of amazing things the other simply cannot match. But admittedly it’s not for everyone