• mistahbenny
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Communists in the USSR weren’t that good either, don’t forget that too… Oh, and weren’t they also the ones that collaborated with the nazis from 1939 to 1941?

    • ComradeSharkfucker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was not societ “collaboration” with the Nazis. It was a self-preserving, non-aggression treaty between a rising fascist empire hell-bent on destroying workers movements like communism as all fascists are and a young workers movement that had been besieged since it’s inception. It gave them the time they needed to industrialize and prepare for the inevitable war with the Germans which they sacrificed so much for. 80% of Nazis were killed by the red army and 27 million soviets died for it.

      Calling that pact collaboration is incredibly direspectful to their history and reveals a severe lack of understanding in both politics and the material situation of those societies at the time.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Yup. I hate historical revisionism. The pact was strategic, not a tacit approval of Nazism.

        Even if you view it from the German point of view, it was the same. Hitler didn’t suddenly like Communism for a short while. He had to build up his forces for invasion.

    • TheOubliette
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ahistorical both sidesing garbage. Read a book some time, TV pop culture and Reddut comments aren’t a substitute.

        • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It kind of takes learning reality to understand contextual differences.

          It might sound lazy when people tell you to educate yourself but that’s what is required.

          If you want to be spoonfed an education on history you should take a history class.

      • comfy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Don’t be a condescending prick, comrade.

        They’re definitely misrepresenting the situation, like @ComradeSharkfucker explained, and I think it would be great if someone could make/share a FAQ so we wouldn’t have to keep typing this by hand. But telling people to read a book some time is the arrogant crap that alienates us from the people we need on our side. More people are reading this than the person you replied to.

        • TheOubliette
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They are here in bad faith and treating them like someone here in good faith is civility fetishism. There are also already plenty of comments providing correction.

          Be direct and honest with people.

      • mistahbenny
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, I do. I also think that they largely contributed to the beggining of the WWII, hence it’s name that’s pretty self-explanatory. The thing is that, in academic history, any war starts with an event. That event is the invasion of Poland on the 1st of September, 1939. I hope you see where I’m going… We could trace back the causes of this war years, maybe even decades before it began, but that’s simply not correct (when talking about what pact/document led to it’s beggining).

        • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Out of all the possible chosen start dates for World War 2, you go with the one that can be used to paint the Soviets in the worst possible light. Just a coincidence, though, I’m sure.

        • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The thing is that, in academic history, any war starts with an event. That event is the invasion of Poland on the 1st of September, 1939.

          Wow and the war in ukraine started exactly in 2022 when the evil vladimir “voldemort” putin randomly decided to invade for no other reason than being evil, right?

          Wow you’re a fucking moron. Wars don’t start with “events,” WWI wasn’t started because some serb killed the Archduke, wars start because of historical and material trends provoking conflict over resources and territory. God you’re fucking stupid

          • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Hmmm I wonder if Britain was doing anything questionable to India or France to Algeria during this timeframe

            Oh wait, I forgot, us-foreign-policy

        • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          What the fuck are you talking about. In academic history, it’s widely understood things don’t just appear out of thin air and the defining event of when nearly any conflict ‘starts’ is a very ideologically motivated choice. It’s exactly what you’re doing now and what Zionists do with the current genocide in Palestine

        • Cowbee [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ah yes, the spontaneous invasion of Poland that happened randomly and had no buildup, the “Big Bang” of WWII, if you will. All event are random, static, and devoid of context and preceding history.

        • davelA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The thing is that, in academic history, any war starts with an event.

          Only in shitty popsci history books do wars start with “an event,” because even bourgeois historians know to distinguish between proximate and ultimate causation.

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The USSR signed a non-aggression pact after trying to get the Western Powers to help protect Czechoslovakia. The Western Powers of course denied this, as they wanted the Nazis to kill the Soviets. The Soviets ended up killing 80% of the Nazis that died in WWII, the scale of the Eastern Front was many times larger than the Western. Moreover, Americans and other western powers were ordered to not attack western business assets in Nazi Germany. This is because the West had ties to the Nazis, while the Communists and Nazis hated each others guts.

      The Red Army saved the world from fascism, and paid the price with tens of millions of lives. They are heroes.

    • vfreire85
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      did the ussr applied fordism to wholesale killing of human beings? no. next question.

    • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Oh look it’s an ignorant liberal, tell me more about how fucking ignorant you are

      Stalin tried to build a coalition against Germany first and was roundly rejected by every other power because wow, i’m so shocked, but capitalist govts actually liked the fascists more, who would have thought

      • mistahbenny
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Stating historical facts means being a liberal to you? Damn.

        • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Care to explain why the west refused to crush the Nazis with Stalin before the molotov ribbentrop pact, why you’re ignoring the fact the Soviets are the only reason Nazism was defeated when it was due to their immense sacrifices on the eastern front, or why you don’t bring up the blatant apologia for Nazis in the West (operation paperclip or Canada calling Nazis “victims of communism”)

          Oh, it’s because you’re a liberal

          countdown

    • ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      @mistahbenny

      This is what I hate about people who are vehemently anti-communist. They can look at a picture displaying the atrocities of fascism and then, instead of demonizing the horrific acts of fascism, decide to change the subject to talk about how evil communism is.

      Anti-communist looking at picture of the Holocaust: “Man, I sure do hate communism.”

      #communism #fascism #anticommunism #nazism #theholocaust

        • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 minutes ago

          Come on, you can’t be surprised if people disagree with you if you try to “point out how much in common nazis have with communists, in a community dedicated to communism.”

          This is a classic, healthy nazi bash post. Can’t people nazi bash in peace anymore?

          Everyone is still replying to your view of why and how things happened, instead of just ignoring the obvious rage-bait.

          Your comment, the one I’m replying to, is akin to “aaw, stop crying. I was just pissing in the tea you were drinking.”

        • Evolith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “The army who fought genocidal fascists to the death are just as bad as the genocidal fascists themselves.”

          You might as well full-send instead of half-assing it and proclaim that Nazis are the poor, innocent victims of unwarranted Communist aggression.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Normilizing fascism through comparison instead of rejecting fascism is literally how the Nazis came to power

      Good job parroting the propaganda like a good nazi dog

      One day you might self reflect long enough to know how fucking dumb you sound defending literal Nazis

    • Kilometers_OBrien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You can’t tell the truth here.

      Sorry not sorry but this shit-hole community is just pig fuckers all the way down to the smelly core.