• Catradora-Stalinism☭
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Wow the same ones who are saying its real are checks notes using the same tactics to continue to say its real. Just checked the apparent source, but they give absolutely nothing, just saying they found it, nothing else, not even audio.

    • mekhos
      link
      12 years ago

      …But if its pro-Invasion twitter is ok right?

      • Catraism-Stalinism
        link
        22 years ago

        the primary sources on business insider is far more untrustworthy

  • @iam0day
    link
    1
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Kulun@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      well, source:

      The radio transmissions were obtained by the Bundesnachrichtendienst, Germany’s foreign intelligence service, and presented to parliament on Wednesday.

      • @gun
        link
        62 years ago

        So German CIA. That’s even worse

          • @gun
            link
            22 years ago

            Intelligence organizations have an agenda. Look into operation northwoods, in which the DOD planned for the CIA to stage false flag terrorist attacks on their own people and blame it on Cuba

    • @poVoq
      link
      -3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @aworldtowin
        link
        72 years ago

        The people on lemmygrad are 10x more communist than the western liberals claiming the term these days that eat up everything the US empire has to say about socialist countries and use words like “Stalinism”.

      • @abbenm
        link
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The point is not to make sense, it’s to make a frivolous low effort claim. It’s kind of like the liars dividend, because it’s a lot easier to be lazy and say something that’s wrong, than it is to put in the effort to correct the wrong thing that was said.

        The liar’s dividend is about demanding something obviously true be proved to the satisfaction of an unreasonably skeptical person which requires all kinds of effort above and beyond what we normally require to establish day to day beliefs.

        This is a little bit different. It could be called the trolls dividend. The goal isn’t really to refute the article, which can take a lot of effort, it’s to kind of split the difference with low effort trolling. Much more efficient.

      • Ball Thrower
        link
        fedilink
        -42 years ago

        Ok so instead would you want me to tell you your source sucks and provides no information outside of claims w/ no evidence? Most of the outside information they give are behind paywalls lol