The subjects that you can’t even bring up without getting downvoted, banned, fired, expelled, cancelled etc.

  • mub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Like I said undertaking is bad. No excuse for doing it, except where it is legal. If someone goes under speed limit in lane 3 you can undertake I believe, though I would still be super cautious.

    Obviously speeding is illegal, and I’m not suggesting anyone should support do so. But we should let the police deal with it.

    Just to clarify, you don’t think it is ok to sit in lane 2 or 3 at the speed limit if there is room to move over ? Not doing so is also illegal in the UK.

    While the majority of people stay within the law (+/- 10%) there are enough people behaving badly on the roads that you should always take that into consideration.

    This is a great example of the is/ought problem. You can try your best to make the “ought” true, but don’t neglect what reality “is”. On the road that means; assume there is an idiot nearby, and drive in a way that keeps you safe from their shit.

    • el_abuelo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You are correct. If the flow of traffic in lane 1 or 2 is faster than the flow of traffic in lane 2 or 3 then it is okay to pass. Intentionally changing lane temporarily to pass a car on the inside is illegal.

      The other poster confused your point.

      If someone in lane 3 is going 69 and overtaking someone then there’s no reason to pass them, and probably isn’t safe or legal given there is, by definition, a car on the inside lane already.