• Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    2 months ago

    Haven’t watched the video, but honestly, the most surprising part of that quote for me is that he seems to have correctly used the word “amorphous”

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except it sounds like he’s talking about energy—as in power for equipment like a stove. Energy isn’t amorphous at all. There’s pretty clear types, sources and distribution methods.

      Either he’s misusing “amorphous” or he doesn’t understand energy.

      • SturgiesYrFase
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Either he’s misusing “amorphous” or and he doesn’t understand energy.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He likely meant “ubiquitous”. Then again, with the wavy hands…

        For those that know, is it normal for dementia-like diseases to drop cognition this fast? Is exhaustion exacerbating it?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love how the guy hears this insanity, immediately looks down at the ground, like “uh oh” and then over at the woman like “you heard that too, right?”

    • mars296@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      He is trying to say that we use energy (presumably he is talking specifically about fossil fuels) for everything and in ways that people may not even realize it. He is saying that without fossil fuels society can’t function.

        • mars296@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone who has always been around people speaking broken English, it becomes very easy to interpret word jumbles and mistranslations.

          • Hikermick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s exhausting but if you examine what he says you’ll find there is some sense to his ramblings. It’s how he blurts them without any context that gives away his dementia

    • n0clue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’s talking about how energy is required for pretty much everything, like if you were going to make donuts (on a stove for some reason) it would take energy, it took energy for them to get to your home, etc. I always hated things like this, like this is one of the most coherent things he’s said, it’s like the boy who cried wolf, when it’s actually noteworthy we’re already tired of hearing it.

      • Volkditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Take a second to remind yourself that if “this is one of the most coherent thing’s he’s said,” how far the bar has been lowered for him and this behavior.

        “It’s not fair to pick on him for this, he completed a full sentence!” Oh, well whoopity-fucking-doo for him.

      • athairmor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re doing what the media and his followers do, though. You’re interpreting for him.

        There may be a coherent idea behind what he says but his ability to express it is severely deficient which is further evidence that he is unfit for the presidency.

        • n0clue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I completely agree that he’s unfit for the presidency, I just didn’t think it was that bad of a sentence.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Energy is required for all work” is not really a noteworthy statement.

        If he managed to say it as coherently as I just did, it might be noteworthy, except for the fact that it would be inevitably followed by an incessant stream of gibberish.

        • n0clue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          So you have a problem with the sentence itself and not that it was spoken by Trump?

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Actually, I have a problem with both.

            It’s a completely unnecessary statement for anyone with an elementary school level understanding of the world. However, if a candidate for president of the United States is going to make such an inane statement, he should at least speak coherently.

            Work requires energy. That’s easy to say, and easy to understand.

            Trump talks like a six year old trying to explain to his parents what he learned in school today.

            • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Who the fuck makes donuts on a stove in a business context or any context really.

              Why would a bakery use a stove instead of a commercial fryer? why would a single person make a donut from scratch with frosting for a single fucking donut at home instead of going to a shop to just buy one for a dollar?

              It’s a terrible sentence, it makes no sense whatsoever in any context.

              It’s just standard trump word vomit.

          • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s the complete opposite of what NABDad said. “If he managed to say it as coherently as I just did,” implies a belief that the sentence is at the very least marginally incoherent. Which further implies that they do actually have a problem with the sentence itself.

            Is your suggestion to the contrary a mistake made because you were overinvested in the point you’re trying to argue, or was it purposeful misinterpretation?

      • Unbecredible@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agree. People in this thread pretending they don’t understand what he’s saying…that’s just bad faith criticism that they’re angry enough to excuse in themselves right now. Resist that shit.

        Given just the added context of his tone of speech in the audio, his meaning became immediately clear. If we had two or three sentences of additional context on either side of this quote, my guess is the text would have been just as easily understandable as the video was.

  • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    He almost sounds like he’s going to start talking about auras and spiritual healing, but it quickly turns into getting a donut delivery

  • bruhbeans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m impressed, to be honest, “amorphous” is probably the biggest word I’ve ever heard him use.

    • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the classic dementia “word salad”. I can sort of understand and follow the thread of what he was trying to say but to most observers it’s going to be a series of intelligible words that add up to have no meaning.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair, that pretty much describes the information communicated to any Trump supporter listening to anyone say anything. They listen for vibes, not meaning.