• N0x0n
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Meanwhile me with my Freezed Firefox version…

    “So what crazy stuff is going to be discussed in arkenfoxe’s Github repo this time?”

  • golden_zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Perhaps if they made decisions like this more often in recent times there would be more people there when they do good stuff.

    Edit: Cool to see someone botting this thread as well. I have now watched on three separate occasions someone vote up on mine and others comments only for a vote down to be applied within 10 seconds - 5 minutes in lockstep each time. This was in the first 15 minutes of the comment being posted.

    2nd Edit. I’ve watched it happen 8 times now actually. I wonder what the odds are that over the course of ~2 hours there is exactly 8 people who agree and exactly 8 who don’t who keep showing up within moments of one another.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You mean like isolating cookies?

      Like integration state partitioning for the entire browser context, user-controllable?

      Like adding vertical tabs?

      Like background wallpaper options for new tab independent of themes?

      Like site translations?

      Like working on tab groups?

      Like working on tablet UI options?

      Like … okay I’ll stop.

      Like with red traffic lights vs green traffic lights, always keep in mind that your brain does not want to actively notice/recall things going well. It’s when things are annoying/interrupting that you remember.

      • golden_zealot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        All I intend to say is that if I left when Mozilla thought it was a good idea to have an advertising company become involved in the development of their products and started tracking users without their consent (even if less invasively than cookies) with PPA, then surely I am not the only one who left.

        This is a company that has previously sideloaded an extension into the browser without user permissions because of a marketing deal they made with a television show. As a result, I’m afraid im less concerned with the not-yet implemented features they may be working on or the features they have in place when there are a litany of other browsers available which don’t fuck around with user permissions and privacy for advertising deals.

        If I wanted a browser for tab grouping and UI stuff, I’d move to vivaldi, but at the moment firefox just doesn’t seem to have the best UI or the best security and both of those are directly related to Mozilla’s choices.

        You are certainly entitled to your opinion and it is valid, but I think that my criticisms are also valid and are not baseless.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          Oh for sure criticism is valid, but it’s funny how people always forget all the actual good stuff being added, too.

          In general, not just Firefox-specific. People constantly forget how while Google search results have gone to shit, empyrical analysis showed that it went to shit more for other search engines (meaning if anything Google got comparatively better, but of course everyone got worse across the board, too). People constantly forget over all their little issues how some countries, including mine, have swapped >50% of their energy (from ~0%) to green energy in just 10 or so years. It’s too easy to see only the negative things.

          • golden_zealot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Yes, it’s true that some good things have been added, I suppose my concern is just that I feel the negative things in the case of firefox hold greater weights when compared to the positive things they have done.

            As a euphemism; a cruise ship adding a bowling alley, better seating, and fine art to its interior is neat and might make it look better and more convenient but it doesn’t mean much to me if they also added an engine which spews 50% more pollution into the atmosphere and poisons me.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      No clue. I doubt it’s a conspiracy, though. Just seems like a controversial take.

      • golden_zealot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        Certainly possible but I’m sure the odds are astronomically low. After I saw this happen 3 times I started refreshing every minute and each time there was a change, both counts had increased, and this happened 8 times in a row. I could see a distribution happening of something like a vote up at minute 2, vote down at minute 3 vote up at minute 12, vote down at minute 20, etc, but this was - vote up and vote down at minute 5, same thing at minute 11, same thing at minute 16, etc, 8 times concurrently (the minutes listed here are an example, I wasn’t tracking exact time between events).

  • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Mozilla foundation also granted some money to ente a company that offers Google photos replacement with end to end encryption.

      • mac@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        i downloaded it after the news the other day. Presently uploading >200gb of pictures.

        Android App has a few quirks, not very snappy, but it looks pretty polished.

        The on device ML seems to be pretty accurate once you start tagging people.

        We’ll see how it handles me throwing the 200gb at it because it was already stuttering a bit when scrolling through ~15gb of pics.

        I havent had the chance to spin up an immich instance yet to compare the two.

        All in all, we might need to wait for a longer term user to chime in, but as of now to me it seems good enough.

          • geography082@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I have self hosted immich almost a year, tried to make it the standard for my family. For me it was a pain in the ass to keep it running and available to have a smooth experience on my family. I had to rebuild it several times because of complex behavior and a few breaking changes, the iOS app is not working properly, I ended up removing it, too much time consuming.

          • mac@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah, Immich has been on my radar for a number of years, but I’ve read a lot about breaking changes being a pain to deal with, and I’m a bit busy as it is right now with work and other personal projects to tinker too heavily.

            Will take a closer look as I hear a stable release is planned soon.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’ve been running mine for a year or two and don’t really mess with it at all. I think I remember those breaking changes maybe 18 months ago? Was not difficult to update, and it’s been running smooth as butter since.

  • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

    We’re all glad to see Mozilla have a win, at least I assume so. But there’s been a lot of other much bigger decisions that have gone on recently that make us (at least me) hesitant to celebrate at the first good thing.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I dunno, finally getting vertical tabs is not exactly making me hesitant to celebrate, quite the opposite. Someone at Mozilla must have been a portrait-mode desktop monitor user, can’t understand the years-long resistance to this otherwise.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      On the more technical side of things they are doing excellent work, it’s on the bike shedding department that the overpaid management is doing idiotic choices.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah it’s like the fucking Goat thing. Mozilla fucked a goat and shocked that that’s all people remember.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Yes and no, total cookie protection prevents cookies from loading from other sites, CHIPS is a new standard that makes it so that that is impossible* to begin with. (simpifying here but thats the idea)

      *unless the browser allows it

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        my impression was that it was impossible already, because there was effectively a different cookie storage for every site

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 hours ago

          oh

          https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Privacy/Privacy_sandbox/Partitioned_cookies

          CHIPS is similar to the state partitioning mechanism implemented by Firefox. The difference is that state partitioning partitions cookie storage and retrieval into separate cookie jars for each top-level site, without a mechanism to allow opt-in to third-party cookies if desired. As browsers start to phase out third-party cookie usage, there are still valid, non-tracking uses of third-party cookies that need to be permitted while developers begin to handle this change.

          so this adds a setting to allow a site access to shared 3rd party cookies, when the site supports the feature?

  • JustMarkov
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

    One good thing will not outweigh ten bad ones.

    Also, is this post on Mastodon? How’s Mozilla’s instance doing? I hope well. /s