Biologically male procedures only. EDIT: If the two people who downvoted this question could explain their reasoning, I would be super interested. No judgements. This is a safe space!

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I was actually told by my doctor that unless you have a history of colon or prostate cancers in the family, advisory boards are pushing testing to past 40.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Idk. When I worked oncology all our prostate patients were very young men way before 40.

      But thats anecdotal. I don’t have any numbers. But whats the worst thing that can happen when you get a prostate check? That they don’t find anything?

      • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I mean the downsides are basically cost, another stick/blood draw, potential for false positive and further anxiety/testing. No weigh-in on whether or not any individual should at any specific time, but even less-invasive screenings are not zero risk.

        Excerpt from the US Preventative Task Force about prostate cancer screening:

        “An elevated PSA level may be caused by prostate cancer but can also be caused by other conditions, including an enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and inflammation of the prostate (prostatitis). Some men without prostate cancer may therefore have positive screening results (ie, “false-positive” results). Men with a positive PSA test result may undergo a transrectal ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the prostate to diagnose prostate cancer.”

    • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, as an early 30s AMAB having to go in for annual checkups for insurance, two different doctors told me there really isn’t shit to do for someone my age