This (arguably unhelpful) phrase seems to be taught across schools all over the world. What are some other phrases like this that are common ?

  • wuphysics87
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Physics can be done without mass. Next question

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s pretty hard though. Without mass, everything travels at the speed of light and doesn’t experience the flow of time, which don’t really mesh well with classical physics (or quantum mechanics, and definitely not relativity).

      • wuphysics87
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Define the speed of light to be 1 (gaussian units). Then Einstein’s E=mc^2 becomes E=m. Mass is energy. In physics mass is not fundamental. Energy is.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          In biology mitochondria are not essential, hydrocarbons are. Life sprung up without mitochondria, but it wouldn’t be what it is without them. Chemistry is fundamental to biology, mitochondria aren’t, but I think you’d agree physics wouldn’t be what it is today without mass, nor would biology be without the mitochondria

          • wuphysics87
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Depends what you mean by “what it is today.”. Mass isn’t fundamental. It is a particle’s coupling to the Higgs Boson which generates mass. The Lagrangian of the Standard Model is an energy equation. Not a mass one.

            • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Do you watch a lot of v-sauce? There’s a certain argumentative style that he instills in his audience that I’m picking up when reading your comments. There’s a lot of nuance and acceptability outside of the strict definitions that goes into the scientific process (as much as strict adherents don’t like it, science is done when we close those gaps, it isn’t immediate nor absolute)