• geneva_convenience
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Atheists religiously repeating the word “science” long enough that they trick themselves into believing they have explained the origins of the universe. And thus there is no reason for anyone to believe in God.

    Certainly science has achieved a lot. However we are no closer to explaining the origins of the universe as before. As the origin has not been explained why is everyone somehow so confident in the falsehood of a creator?

    Agnosticism (not being sure about a creator) is totally fine. However Atheists have a weird obsession about being absolutely certain of something they cannot prove an their alternative for. Atheism runs on pure faith that “science will figure it out in the future”. It is a religion in itself.

    The “largest minds” of Atheism are all too often based on pure emotion. As we find with Richard Dawkins, the man so smart that he can explain the universe away… and also believes Israel is not committing Genocide in Gaza.

    https://raseef22.net/english/article/1095904-et-tu-dawkins-you-refuse-religion-but-support-israel

      • geneva_convenience
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Atheism is certainty of the nonexistence of a creator.

        As clearly demonstrated in this thread by people certain of their atheism so much you would be hard pressed to find a religious person so arrogant in their beliefs.

        • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Atheism is certainty of the nonexistence of a creator.

          This is wrong. The only thing required to be an atheist is lacking a belief in theistic claims. You don’t need to make the claim that God doesn’t exist, and most atheists don’t.

          The only thing we’re certain of (not absolutely, but fairly certain) is that theists haven’t met their burden of proof.

            • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You highlighted the A without any understanding of what the prefix a- means. It means not, or without.

              I’m not a theist because they haven’t convinced me of any theistic claims. I don’t claim no gods exist. I just don’t know of any gods that exist, therefore I am without theism. A-theism.

              • geneva_convenience
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                https://www.dictionary.com/e/atheism-agnosticism/

                There is a key distinction between these terms. An atheist doesn’t believe in the existence of a god or divine being. The word atheist originates with the Greek atheos, which is built from the roots a- (“without”) and theos (“a god”). Atheism is the doctrine or belief that there is no god.

                In contrast, the word agnostic refers to a person who neither believes nor disbelieves in a god or religious doctrine. Agnostics assert that it’s impossible to know how the universe was created and whether or not divine beings exist.

                  • geneva_convenience
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    They seem quite confident as they proclaim their superiority over religious people and cannot comprehend why anyone would be religious.

          • geneva_convenience
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You are free to correct a person in a conversation if you feel so inclined.

              • geneva_convenience
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                So indeed nothing of value as expected.

                It’s difficult to dismantle an argument that does not exist. I suppose if your explanation is non existent you always win the discussion. Le epic Atheist wins again.