• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It said era, so I assume “modern” could just as well land you in 2006 Iraq, if it’s even allowed.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Depends what reference frame you’re using. If you’re following an inertial frame backwards through time you’re most likely to end up deep inside the Earth, actually, because that would put you in a sort of orbit.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s not. The good news is it’s sucking you in like a high pressure opening doesn’t, and at least your end isn’t falling, so that’s probably not how the magic works.

              The other trope-based possibility is it leaves you roughly where you geographically are in your new era. That’s limiting as hell if you’re somewhere with a short history like I am, which I guess is another argument to go recent.

      • WeirdbeardgameOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I tried to leave it a bit open. i meant era in the sense of “the 90s, 80s, modern 2000s etc” but that can be taken other ways