Slowly exploring the lemmy ecosystem, since I don’t want to use reddit, and was wondering if selfhosting would be a good idea?

  • zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago
    • More private, if you’re overly conscious about your IP being tracker by instance host
    • You own your data
    • You can experiment with alpha releases
    • You can customize everything. Default CSS, javascript, etc
    • You can’t be censored (only defederated)
    • JetpackJackson
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not the OP, but can you move your account to a private instance or is it not possible at the moment?

      • Spzi@lemmy.click
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not yet, that’s (open) issue #1985: Moving user profile to a new instance.

        The devs also explicitly mentioned this request in their statement:

        we are seeing lots of requests to implement major new features, such as migration between instances, or combining similar communities. As described above, we are completely overloaded with work, and definitely won’t have time to implement these in the near future. If there is a feature you want to see implemented, you will likely need to work on it yourself, or find someone who can.

        For now, you can create another account on another instance and use that instead (or both), or just peek how the experience might be.

        • JetpackJackson
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah ok, I might try making a second account at some point, not yet though.

    • gun/linux@latte.isnot.coffee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can customize everything. Default CSS, javascript, etc

      I use a browser extension to modify CSS client side

      You can’t be censored (only defederated)

      The law can censor you (although you could put a Lemmy instance on i2p)

      Everything else you said is right

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the instance your account is on decides to shutdown, you lose everything, your account and all your contributions, on your own instance you don’t.

  • chris@l.roofo.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes. I am immune from the beehaw/lemmy.world drama or similar. I can block instances as I please and I can tinker with my instance.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can tinker with my instance.

      I didn’t even find a SANE way to set it up with Docker without having to tinker with the instance. I just want a container not generating half a dozen of other containers and volumes.

      • Fauxreigner@lemmy.fauxreigner.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A single container for everything gets away from the point of containerization. If you have a single container for lemmy-ui, lemmy backend, and postgres, you need to rebuild that container whenever any one of those applications gets an update, and they could start to interfere with each other. Keeping them in separate containers makes everything a lot cleaner, it just requires something like docker compose to put it all together.

        Did you try the Ansible install? Provided you’re installing onto a supported Debian/Ubuntu version, I found it fairly straightforward.

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see the container thing a little different. A container should contain all things that are needed to run the containered application (and if it is a web application then exposing one single port). Creating containers should not create multiple other containers ( have no other use for) or networks, or volumes.

          • underisk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They aren’t all one application. Many of the parts can be swapped out for alternatives, shared with other services, or just excluded entirely. They can also be scaled separately which is important because not all of them need to scale at the same rate.

            What you want is explicitly what docker-compose exists to do.

            • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Many of the parts can be swapped out for alternatives, shared with other services

              Let’s go through it.

              1. proxy: image: nginx:1-alpine I already have one running, why do I now need another one installed als another container exclusively for Lemmy?
              2. pictrs: image: asonix/pictrs:0.4.0-beta.19 I have no other use for this except for Lemmy, why do I need another container just for this application I never heard of?
              3. postgres: image: postgres:15-alpine I have absolutely no use for Postgres. Why do I need to install a database server as container just for being used by Lemmy, and Lemmy only?

              And then, yes, of course, lemmy and lemmy-ui

              So 5 different containers (and 4 volumes, and 2 networks) all set up only for Lemmy, cluttering my setup – not counted in all the volumes, containers, and networks set up by the 3 additional containers.

              And since I’m pinned to specific versions I need to manually check new/changed dependencies when updating Lemmy instead of just rebuilding the container.

              I still see no point in that.

              • underisk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It is common to run more than one application in a given server. Nginx, for example, is widely used as a reverse proxy and web server for operating multiple containerized applications on the same server. Postgres is a commonly used database that can potentially be used on hundreds of applications simultaneously. Duplicating them on all containers would just create a mountain of problems and waste resources for no real benefit.

                If all you’re running is lemmy then why are you so upset about containers “cluttering” up things? What is there to clutter up, your docker ps output ? If you want, just pretend the host is itself a container running lemmy (which it might just be, depending on your host!). Alternately, make your own nested container that just does a docker-compose up and pointlessly duplicate all the services you want. Complaining that the container managers don’t do this for you, to the detriment of others who don’t share your specific niche, is just blatantly entitled and absurd.

                • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nginx, for example, is widely used as a reverse proxy

                  I use it as reverse proxy already. Why do I need to install a reverse proxy for Lemmy?

                  If all you’re running is lemmy then why are you so upset about containers “cluttering” up things?

                  That’s the thing: i don’t.

                  But maybe I should get a real or virtual machine used exclusively for Lemmy and adding its Docker environment to my current Portainer installation.

      • deejay4am@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, kinda. lemmy doesn’t have super great moderation tools yet, and the influx of users on lemmy.world and lemmy.ml included people posting some content that was against beehaw’s moderation guidelines. Rather than deal with being overwhelmed without much option, they decided to temporarily defederate until there was a clear path to resolving the issue (i.e. better mod tools).

        I think people are making it out to be a bigger deal than it really is, and those flames are probably being stoked by the trolls.

        There are plenty of “no actually assault weapons are good for society” and “actually Ukraine is the aggressor” groypers around now, but I guess that just means Lemmy is getting popular enough to attract the masses - which in the end is a net positive.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also feel like users assume Lemmy is a lot more developed than it is.

          Reddit went through several back end changes as it grew over time, and Lemmy has done very little in that regard.

          You also have such a small user base that Lemmy isn’t important. Once Lemmy becomes important, it is going to need to deal with a lot of issues that it currently isn’t designed to deal with.

          Lemmy is going to need to learn to scale.

        • Noreia@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I can consider myself lucky for not having seen any of those types of people yet

  • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you mean hosting a server just for your own personal use? Technical knowhow aside there are pros and cons.

    Pros:

    • You’re very unlikely to get defederated from anywhere and can control exactly who you defederate from
    • You’re not at the whim of your server owner suddenly deciding to shut down one day
    • You can decide whether or not to host communities on your server, in which case you’ll have control over exactly which ones get to be hosted there

    Cons:

    • You’ll need to search harder for communities to build up your subscription feed because you won’t have other users searching and indexing new things all the time, so you’ll be fairly reliant on sites like lemmyverse.net at least at first.
    • Anecdotally I’ve heard that once you’ve got some bigger communities federated with your own, the database storage requirements can be surprisingly big. That’s just from off-hand comments from other admins though, I don’t know enough to comment or have any hard numbers on it.
  • hyorvenn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a casual user the benefit is that your account isn’t tied to someone else instance. Meaning it cannot disappear if an admin decides to give up maintaining your home instance. Aside from that, if you do not want to host a community, not much.

  • KNova@links.dartboard.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You end up as the ultimate decider on what you federate with. If you join someone else’s community you might not agree with their administration or moderation decisions.

    It’s a fun exercise in system administration, it taught me some new things. It got me interested in Rust as a programming language (not that you need to know that to run an instance - I was just tinkering w: source code)

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve created my own instance, just because I wanted to see how and I like self-hosting. The only drawback I found at the moment is that my instance seems several comments/posts behind reality. Wish it was faster, can sometimes be hours behind.

  • lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It means that you aren’t subject to anyone else’s decision making or the effects of that like defederation. But obviously there are implications on cost and work for you

  • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are two big benefits in my opinion.

    1. Speed and responsiveness. When the bigger instances were (or are) overloaded, my Lemmy experience was still fast and snappy. Content was slower to update for those big instances, but navigating Lemmy itself was still fine, and it gave me an opportunity to engage with some smaller communities.

    2. Control of federation. I decide who to federate with, and as long as I follow other instance and community rules, I won’t get defederated.

    The biggest downside is that I can’t discover new communities organically since I’m the only real active user of my instance. Nothing new gets federated unless I seek it out. But I solve that by using a fediverse indexer every week or so to search for popular or interesting communities.

    • フ卂ㄖ卄乇卂卄@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But I solve that by using a fediverse indexer every week or so to search for popular or interesting communities.

      Is there a way to automatically federate with other instances? Because I started my own Lemmy instance, and its annoying having to manually go to every community in order to federate with it. (The instance is for my own personal use, so I won’t be opening registrations)

      • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, there are two tools I use to do so.

        1. Lemmy Community Seeder - Very customizable tool that by default grabs the top 50 posts in the top 50 communities of the specified instances every few hours.

        2. Lemmony - Less customizable tool that by default grabs pretty much everything. Probably less ideal for larger or more active instances, but my instance has 5 or 6 users, only a couple of which are active, so this tool has been awesome for populating my “All” feed.

        I recommend creating a non-admin bot account and using that for these tools.

        • hamburglar26@wilbo.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Badass thanks for this. I’ve enjoyed kinda keeping my instance more catered but starting to want to at least have more available and just subscribe to the stuff I want to see regularly.

  • Spzi@lemmy.click
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it technically possible to host the instance on the same machine you use for browsing lemmy?

    Are there any guides on the topic?

    • RedirectedPotato@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So based on my understanding, you’d need a public endpoint, and probably a domain name as well. So if the system you are using has a public ip, a domain, and is always online, then yes.

      So technically yes, realistically no

  • Generator@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not that i’ve done it, but can have some benefits: uptime, create your own communities, less server overload, restrict users, use it only for friends/family.

    Also there are some for specific topics like “Path of Exile” (game), Star Trek, FOSS.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You become your own admin, with all the privileges and rights therein. You are also less likely to be defederated since your server is less likely to create problems with other servers.