To put this into perspective, China’s high-speed rail project in Indonesia connecting Jakarta and Bandung (a distance of 143 km) at a speed of 350 km/h was completed in just four months at total cost of $7.3 billion.

This line has seen an impressive number of passengers, with approximately 2 million people utilizing the service.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 months ago

    Project leaders estimate it will still need an additional $100 billion to finish what voters were originally pitched in 2008

    lol, there are people learning to drive that began existence the same year as this plan. Really helping to provide timely emissions reductions team doomer

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    Still worth it in the country with a military budget over 8 times that but ffs there’s no reason that should cost more than 10% of what it does

    In other countries inflating the costs of public works to hand over money to private interests is called “corruption,” what’s it called here?

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    By 2030, and a trillion dollars later, they will have finally established a public-private partnership charging $700 per person to ride on the not-greyhound medium-speed shuttle bus between SF and LA!

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 months ago

    Zeno’s California Rail Project. Its so fucking funny that “damn, this whole thing is shady af, look at all the grifts and crimes and cons involved!” was a B-plot in a True Detective season released in 2015 and they’re still getting away with it.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “You can use private sector partners when you are in a segment where it’s likely to be profitable,” he said. “I think that’s hard to do in the Central Valley, but more likely in the Bay Area and Los Angeles regions.”

    God damn America.

    I would still go with it, it is the first time America is trying to do HSR, $100b is nothing (America spends $800b annually on military)

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      $100b is nothing

      Its a fuckton of money. Its over five times the GDP of the country of Georgia. I wouldn’t even be arguing “HSR isn’t worth it”. I’d be arguing we need a fucking HSR Joseph Stalin to kill all the motherfuckers who have been involved in the project to date, start over, and do it right.

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        yea but that’s not happening in the shithole that is the US. What I meant is that they should stop caring this much about the money aspect and look at whether the progress is good. $100b is a lot for normal people and smaller countries but not much for a (falling off) superpower, and it’s spread out over many years.

        The 2008 bailout for instance was like $29000b

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          The 2008 bailout for instance was like $29000b

          A one time bailout of the national economy that included a bunch of HSR funding from coast to coast.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh, don’t let them make you believe for a second that they are actually incompetent. They’ve been dragging their feet for this, looking almost pleadingly at the California people to beg them to make them stop ever since they voted on it. Sure, high-speed rail projects unfortunately have a bad habit of going over-budget, but this is obvious weaponized incompetence.

      porky-happy: “Teehee! Oopsie-daisy, looks like we can’t do anything right, so quirky! Now never expect any project from us again. You’re driving a car and you’re gonna like it!”

    • Poison_Ivy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Its by design. When the 10 freeway in downtown LA got damaged in a fire and it was speculated that repairs would take months to reopen the freeway (for perspective the freeway does through the heart of DTLA and connects a lot of vital areas of the city with rachother)

      They had it fixed in 5 days with enough political pressure.

      They could have a series of high speed public transit all over the state if they wanted to, its not a question of resources since Los Angeles and California as a whole is a very very wealthy and resource rich state.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Make it so.

    I can think of three people in the US that has more money than that to their names.

    100 billion ain’t shit no more. Quit telling us we aren’t worth a Bezos, or take it from Bezos so I don’t have to suffer under the hypocrisy.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think the money is the problem. For one thing, it shouldn’t cost $100 billion. The Kyushu bullet train was built in 2004 and cost $6 billion. It’s 159 miles long. The SF to LA train would be around 390 miles long, and yet would cost over 15x that of an equivalent Japanese train.

      The problem is the private companies contracted for this thing don’t actually want to build trains, they want to make a profit. They make enough of a profit from scamming tax subsidies, so they never actually have to build the train.

  • itappearsthat@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    sit-back-and-enjoy

    except sadly this country’s inability to do anything other than burn 1 ton of carbon per human moved per mile is taking the entire world down with it