I rent so I cannot set up a wired system. I need two of them and preferably they’d be okay in severe weather. Thunderstorms are common in spring / autumn as is severe weather including tornadoes. In fact my house nearly got hit by one two months ago. Fun times. Summers are hot and sometimes humid. Currently 90s. Triple digits probably late this month or next.

We don’t typically get snow in the winter but it can get cold. Reached zero degrees last December. Supposed to be “rare” but climate is changing and whatnot.

Would prefer to keep it under $300 for both cameras but I’m willing to bump it up a little for better quality if necessary.

  • jurrasicjonn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    All my cameras are cheap wireless webcams with absolutely no ability to communicate outside the local network. They connect to a home built Linux system that I vetted personally.

    Honestly, it’s not that hard. But most folks don’t know that or care. They just want to buy, plug in, and go. That the device they brought into their home and just attached to the same network that has all their photos, access to bank accounts, etc might be a spy device doesn’t even occur to them.

    • bigbox
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I would love to set something like this up. Are there any online tutorials you would recommend?

  • CMDR_Horn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You could go Ubiquiti. 200 for a dream router and 100 each for g4 instants. I think your recordings would go to an SD card, but I’m not sure, I have a dream machine pro, so it’s a bit different. No monthly charges since it’s all hosted at home. Camera quality is better than all of my neighbors with rings

  • perkele@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, a Lorex/Dahua/Hikvision IP camera, or even a no-name amazon IP camera should work. They all support ONVIF and can generally be watched over HTTP. They don’t require a NVR or anything and certainly don’t require anything more than a network connection. They’re not wireless, however.

  • andrew@radiation.party
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you’re technical and have a spare windows license and machine sitting around, you could hook up cameras to a local Blue Iris instance and block direct internet access for whatever cameras are on your network.

    BI is a pain to use though, and finding cameras that work well and support rtsp (or other supported protocols) can be tricky. I run a few wyze mini v3’s with a custom firmware in this configuration and they work great.

      • Wolfric82@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        With the echo sure. But in that regard what isn’t spying on us? Our phones are always listening lol. As far as the cameras though they are on their own self contained system. Saved footage as far as I know doesn’t even get uploaded to any of their servers. It’s all just saved to your personal hub on an SD card.

        • bigbox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t really like the argument “what isn’t spying on us?”. I’d rather avoid anything that spies on its users and doesn’t respect privacy as much as possible. It’s not completely unavoidable.

          • Wolfric82@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I understand what you are saying but it’s is inescapable I feel if we want to continue to use these personal assistant devices. Hey Google and Siri are the same. They all have to be constantly listening in order to be able to pickup when we are talking to them. The level of interconnectability we want as a society and personal recommendations when using those systems inherently come with a need to be tracked both physically and on the internet. Just by agreeing to use an app like find my phone you agree to be tracked by having location services turned on. We all signed away our privacy a long time ago willingly

            • bigbox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              If you look up Graphene OS, it’s possible to have smart phone and use smart features and Google apps without being spied on. The OS runs all those apps in a sandbox with no permissions. It’s pretty cool, but only for Pixel phones and you need some technical know-how to flash the rom (if you understand how Lemmy works though you’re probably pretty tech savvy already).

              • Wolfric82@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                So somehow we need the world to give up their apple and and android phones. I don’t see that happening LOL. It’s awesome to know it’s a possibility though.

                • bigbox
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Graphene os IS Android though. It’s literally Android with every app working, just sandboxed so no Google tracking